Phi and the Tetractys - Part 3 - The Curious Case Of The Covid Serpent (revised 28-08-25)

Christ and Beast consciousness in our DNA?

Introduction

This article is the third part of the series Phi and the Tetractys. In Part 1 we showed that DNA itself embodies the golden ratio and the Pythagorean Tetractys: 10 base pairs per turn, 21 Å in diameter, 34 Å in pitch – consecutive Fibonacci numbers expressing the very geometry of life. In Part 2 we extended that frame into areas usually dismissed as mystical or anomalous. We demonstrated that naming, prophecy, and symbolic anticipation are not superstitions but structural recursions: the field itself speaking through language and archetype before science catches up.

In The Spiral Hidden Part1 we showed how Phi is encoded in temperature, and in A Spiral Hidden Part2 how it is encoded into water. The entirety of IXOS is inherently structured around the constants of c (the speed of light), a higher harmonic of Light in 4D space, which I named SOL, and the phi torus in its many and varied forms. c multiplied by phi squared is the value of SOL, which I discovered indirectly through the logic of the geometry of light and how it forms the basis of 3D physics. Which informs us of how Time and Relativity derive from the higher dimensional 4D state. My larger work Return of the Storm God is an ambitious project attempting to show how fundamental patterns of Nature were recognised by the ancients and encoded into myth, used in sacred architecture, but removed in the past and hidden by self-appointed elites in their imposed systems of religion.

Part 3 now brings the same IXOS lens to our own time. The crown, the serpent, the number 666, the cross of Christ and the glyph of Psi have all returned in the Covid era – not merely as metaphors, but as convergences across language, chemistry, and symbol. Some of this was deliberate design: biotechnology platforms, naming choices, and scripted responses. Some of it arises from archetype, the field’s own recursion. Either way, the result is the same: Revelation is no longer a sealed book of mysticism but a structural warning made visible again.

---

The Curious Case of Covid as the Revelation and Warning

The title ‘The Curious Case of the Covid Serpent’ does intentionally echo a Conan Doyle Sherlock Holmes story. We are about to deconstruct a mass of evidence, Holmes-style, and provide a logical restoration of the data. Only through acute awareness of how the Field consciously speaks to us, through a language inherent in my IXOS work, does it make the most sense.

First, I will give the summation – the Watson version of Holmes’s closing account, where he sets out the pattern plainly after the fact. The detail, the ‘brain attic’ in which Holmes stored every fragment of data to reach the conclusion, will be left to the appendices. There, at the end, will be his ultimate summation, bringing it all together.

In Chapter 8a of Return of the Storm God, I explored the significance of the Algiz rune as a symbol on St Cuthbert’s coffin, taken by the Church to mean Chi Rho, the monogram of Christ. I showed how the same glyph is also the officially recognised Greek Psi – the root of our words psychology, psyche, psychiatry – as well as a waveform function in physics. The Chi Rho is also spelled XP, and is the root of our Rx shorthand for pharmacy.

I go into detail in the appendices to show these derivations – see also Return of the Storm God Chapter 8 for in-depth background.

I do not insist that all of this has been deliberately designed as an operation of elites against the world’s population. But much of it has had the effect of damaging and harming the population of the earth through biochemical carelessness and rushed protocols. I do believe this has been a planned and executed stage designed to remove power from the people further into the hands of a controlling elite. However, what this article shows is much more.

It indicates and supports my IXOS work on the Phi field behind manifest universal reality. I have provided for the first time a scientific explanation for soul, memory, and consciousness nested in the field and experienced linearly as ‘time’. But that time, like energy, is a recursive phenomenon that ripples not only forwards but also backwards. Once nested in the etheric state within the 4D and re-enters into our dimension over the IO gate, it becomes omnipresent and omniscient: the very ‘mind of God’ that we create, and which creates us.

Therefore, we now have a scientific theory for prophecy and foresight. It explains that cause is effect is cause. That those before us may have faintly perceived data from the present, nested in the space-time continuum, is no longer a concept to be rejected or ridiculed as superstition.

Knowledge of Pythagorean geometry known to the ancient pyramid builders, for example, may have been inspired by more recent discoveries, intuited and seen in the inner journeys of Egyptian geometer-shamans and early masonic guilds. Another example is the naming of the element Lithium as ‘the first stone’, long before physics discovered that lithium was the first solid matter formed after the Big Bang.

Anomalies and out-of-place artefacts abound in history that indicate a pre-linear emergence of knowledge long before conventional science and history can adequately fit it into its framework.

---

Prophecy of John

¹⁷καὶ ἵνα μή τις δύνηται ἀγοράσαι ἢ πωλῆσαι εἰ μὴ ὁ ἔχων τὸ χάραγμα, τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ θηρίου ἢ τὸν ἀριθμὸν τοῦ ὀνόματος αὐτοῦ. ¹⁸Ὧδε ἡ σοφία ἐστίν· ὁ ἔχων τὸν νοῦν ψηφισάτω τὸν ἀριθμὸν τοῦ θηρίου· ἀριθμὸς γὰρ ἀνθρώπου ἐστί· καὶ ὁ ἀριθμὸς αὐτοῦ χξϛʹ.

‘¹⁷And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. ¹⁸Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is 666.’

An example of field data received as a pre-echo is John’s prophecy known as Revelation. It describes with striking accuracy the time we now live in – an age where one may neither buy nor sell without a digital ‘mark.’ John linked this to a number: 666. Today we know that same number describes the atomic structure of carbon: 6 protons, 6 neutrons, and 6 electrons. Carbon is the basis of organic life on earth, and in the form of the double helix it is the scaffold of DNA.

Carbon is perhaps the most controversial subject of our age. We are on the verge of being able to buy and sell, only according to our digital record of our ‘carbon footprint’, if some futurists and sinister elites have their way. The world is ruled by petrochemical pharma giants and the military-industrial complex, all of it fuelled by carbon and managed financially by the banks that administrate their profits.

The symbol of the six-pointed star is the crystalline hexagonal carbon ring. Graphene in this form is becoming increasingly used in technology and is being hailed as a next-level medical intervention, including ‘smart implants’. We are slowly poisoning all life on the planet with carbon-derived ‘forever chemicals’ and plastics as micro and nano plastics. The facts are: carbon is the basis of all beasts, and the Great Beast that threatens to devour us. Carbon, essentially defines our world politics through the ever-encroaching threat of pollution and the manipulation of the so-called ‘man-made’ climate changing factor upon which propaganda the world is removing the wealth and freedoms of the masses into ever-increasingly rich and powerful self-appointed elites’ hands.

That this is the ‘age of carbon’, there is no doubt. This is the age of 666. This is the age of reckoning with that Beast.

This text was written and declared prophecy long before any scientific knowledge of atomic structure, let alone DNA, was available. Was John – or the community behind the text – perceiving field data as a pre-ripple of what was to come? Are we now entering the very stage of Apocalypse, or Revelation, that he foresaw? I leave that for the reader to decide. My role here is to communicate the structural correspondences as they appear.

Note: As with all of my work, I present data from academically attested sources. The facts are verifiable, though my interpretation situates them within a revised context. Readers are invited to judge for themselves. Nothing in this article should be taken as medical advice; such decisions should always be made personally and in consultation with healthcare providers.

---

Psi from a Symbol of Christ to Science of the Genetic Vaccine Platform

Psi (Ψ), earlier seen as glyph of the soul and field, is now reassigned in molecular biology as the symbol for pseudouridine, a synthetic RNA base used in genetic insertion. The seer’s sign has become the mark for rewriting genetic code.

In the chemical production of pseudouridine, carbon and hydrogen (C and H) are altered via methylation, introducing a cross-shaped chemical bond. Uracil – a name echoing the Uraeus serpent of the goddess – is transformed into pseudouridine, a synthetic base marked by Psi.

The name SARS-CoV-2 also carries resonance. Cov is a consonantal variant of cob in ‘cobra’ (see Appendix), and within the spike sequence scientists have identified snake-venom-like motifs and even cone snail venom analogues – the latter striking for its Fibonacci-spiral shell, a natural phi structure.

The spike protein also contains an anomalous furin cleavage site, widely recognised as evidence of laboratory insertion. Functionally it operates like fangs: dividing, penetrating, and injecting its payload into the host cell, which is then turned into a spike-generating factory.

Pseudouridine itself contains one carbon and three hydrogen atoms – one C and three H. Symbolically this becomes the 666 element (carbon) surrounded by a trinity of hydrogens, forming a CH cross – the Chi of Chi-Rho, the so-called cross of Christ.

Coincidence? Perhaps. But when set against the scale of the event, the convergences are too marked to ignore.

And over all this hung the admitted psyops campaign – fear weaponised to drive compliance with the new genetic platform. Psy-ops becomes Psi-ops. Psy is the gate to the Id. And the disease itself is named Cov-ID.

‘Curious, Watson. The very name Pfizer, with its old-style letterform in its official logo, with the old English ‘long s’ as the f, hides the Greek Psi in plain sight. The clue was before us all along.’

Psyops, Fear, and the Breach of Consent

The Covid era was not only defined by biology but by psychology. In multiple Western states, government communications units openly admitted to using fear as a deliberate behavioural lever. The UK’s SPI-B committee minutes recorded that “the perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased using hard-hitting emotional messaging” to secure compliance. Similar strategies were employed worldwide.

This was not neutral public health education. It was psychological manipulation — the deliberate exaggeration of fear to induce compliance. Under the principles derived from the Nuremberg Code and embedded in mental health and medical law, both coercion and enticement are prohibited in matters of informed consent. Consent is only valid when given freely, without undue pressure or manipulation. A campaign based on fear undermines that principle at its foundation.

The result was a mass psyops effect: populations divided into binaries of good and bad. Those who accepted the vaccine or lockdowns were told they were protecting others; those who dissented were labelled reckless, selfish, or even dangerous. Public figures amplified the division. Arnold Schwarzenegger told Americans to ‘screw your freedoms.’ President Biden stated: “If you’re vaccinated, you won’t get Covid… the virus stops with you.” These claims not only proved false, but framed dissenters as threats to humanity.

In practice, this created a social climate where many felt justified in wishing harm on sceptics, in calling for denial of medical treatment, and in treating the unvaccinated as ‘walking Typhoid Marys.’ Families divided, communities split, and debate was replaced by denunciation. What had once been a shared public sphere collapsed into a moral battlefield of compliant versus defiant. This resulted in a global Mass Formation event.

Event 201, Wuhan, and the Serpent’s Release

The timing of Covid’s emergence cannot be ignored. In October 2019, Event 201 was convened by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Gates Foundation. It simulated a global coronavirus outbreak and rehearsed policy responses. Notably, the protocols it endorsed did not follow the conventional pandemic playbook of rapid containment and targeted care. Instead, it proposed unprecedented measures: sustained lockdowns, mass behavioural control, and accelerated deployment of new vaccine platforms. These were closer to bioweapon response strategies than public-health containment.

At the same time, the World Military Games were hosted in Wuhan, bringing thousands of service members from across the globe to the same city later identified as the pandemic’s epicentre. Within weeks, participants had dispersed worldwide.

Subsequent investigations by the US House Select Committee on the Coronavirus Pandemic (2023–2024) concluded that the weight of evidence points to a research-related origin at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Signals from early data, molecular analyses, and internal communications suggested that SARS-CoV-2 bore hallmarks of a gain-of-function chimera virus, not a purely zoonotic spillover.

The sequence is stark:

• A simulation of a coronavirus pandemic (Event 201)

• A mass international gathering in Wuhan (Military Games)

• The outbreak itself, traced to Wuhan laboratories

• And the immediate adoption of the very protocols rehearsed weeks earlier

To Holmes, such a chain would not be dismissed as happenstance. ‘Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.’ The serpent did not strike in secret — its release was heralded in planning, rehearsed in simulation, and unleashed in the very place rehearsed.

By mid-2021, we already had accumulated enough evidence to suspend the mRNA genetic vaccines, and enough evidence to show that the emergency use authorisation was built upon a false premise that other safer therapeutics were not already known and available. Yet, the world marched on as if only the new vaccines could have any chance at saving us all from mass deaths.

As Holmes once remarked: ‘The vilest depths of human depravity are possible to man.’ The most diabolical strategies often succeed because no one dares suspect them.

---

The Lipid Platform and Phospholipid Gate

The new genetic vaccine platforms depend on a lipid carrier. Synthetic RNA is fragile and would quickly degrade in the body if left exposed. To reach the cytoplasm, it must first cross the membrane barrier, and for this it is encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles.

Lipids are not a random choice. They are the natural mediators of all cellular boundaries. The phospholipid molecule is amphipathic – a phosphate ‘head’ that is hydrophilic and two hydrocarbon ‘tails’ that are hydrophobic. This geometry compels them to self-assemble into bilayers, which then curl into membranes and vesicles. These bilayers regulate passage into and out of the cell and act as the gate of the cytoplasm.

The platform uses exactly this pathway. By surrounding pseudouridine-modified RNA with phospholipids, the nanoparticles merge with the cell membrane. The lipid shell fuses with the lipid bilayer, and the phosphate head group mediates the crossing. Only then can the contents be released into the cytoplasm.

It is the phospholipid state itself that enables entry: phosphate at the head forming a cruciform geometry with oxygen, the lipid tails providing enclosure and drive. In 2005 I identified the pathway that allows nano and micro particles to pass through the gut and into the cells. It is this same pathway that became the foundation of the mRNA delivery system used during the Covid era – the lipid–phosphate vessel as the carrier of code.

---

The SAR

In Mesopotamian mathematics, šar (SAR) denotes 3,600, written as 60 × 60. In IXOS this is more than arithmetic. Written as three stacked sixties – 60, 60, 60 – it symbolically reduces to 6–6–6 and points to carbon, the elemental scaffold of organic life: 6 protons, 6 electrons, 6 neutrons.

So the atom that appears as unity in 3D is actually a dual wind across the 4D axis, stabilised by a third. 666 is therefore a trinity derived from prime duality – a structural truth about incarnation, not a superstition.

IXOS measure – exact mapping

• SAR = 3,600 = 60×60. Under IXOS class-collapse, this resolves to six electron–proton vortices arranged as a tetractys totality at the IO gate – unity expressed as 10.

• The other six are neutrons. They are the six torus-stabilising units on the axis that allow the six e–p vortices to co-exist – the 4D gate that closes the system.

• ρ mapping. Using the IXOS ρ operator to translate Greek sexagesimal into Roman decimal classes, 3,600 → 3,000. This mirrors CH₃ in methylation – carbon with three hydrogens – a living CH cross.

• Third six as gate. The neutron six is the gate revolving on the 4D axis. The 6+6 unity of e–p is the active bow across that axis. Because electrons are ½-spin, the return requires 720 degrees – the same 72 logic already established in the article 007: The James Bond.

So far we have spoken only of the Chi – the cross in CH₃. What about the Rho?

The genetic backbone of DNA adds another element: phosphorus. Its chemical symbol P mirrors the Greek Rho. Each phosphate group binds four oxygens in a cruciform geometry. This is the Cuthbert cross in chemistry – the elemental backbone of the helix itself.

To Rho the Chi completes the transformation. Methylation alters the equal-armed cross of the CH bonds – the ancient Anunnaki cross seen again on St Cuthbert’s coffin – into the Christian crucifix in biochemical form: CH (Chi) joined to phosphate P (Rho) to carry the code.

Thus, uracil is artificially transformed into a stabilised pseudouridine, and at every stage the same elemental set is at work: CHOP – carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, phosphorus. To gain entry to the cell and redirect genetic translation toward the spike protein, the platform again depends on CHOP, carried through the phospholipid system as the vessel of delivery.

---

How would Holmes summarise this so far?

‘My dear Watson, you must see it. These letters are not arbitrary marks of man’s invention. They are the residue of ancient naming, which anticipated their very function long before science uncovered it. They stand now as the alphabet of life itself. We called them by these names long before we understood genetics, and yet they align with it exactly. They are also the most fundamental letters used in Christianity in the various interpretations of the word Christ in symbolic form as Chi Rho. To ascribe that to chance would be folly of the highest order. The coherence is too exact. It is the unmistakable trace of a higher intelligence in the Field, and it is a message we would be wise to heed — for it speaks with the same precision as John’s prophecy, and only a fool would dismiss such convergences as mere coincidence.’

---

Phosphorus

Phosphorus is the name of the element known as Lucifer in the Roman language and mythos of Light descending into matter. It is also known as Venus, the planet which ascribes a perfect pentagram relative to the Earth in its progress through its solar cycle over 8 years. And every internal angle and proportion within a pentagram is the golden ratio: Phi. This is why the pentagram is associated with magic and the feminine goddess, and why the Church proscribed it as sinful and of the Devil. It is not evil, it is the goddess ratio unveiled.

It may stretch credulity to believe that synchronicities can occur even at the atomic level.

But the alternative - that we refuse to see coherence simply because we cannot yet explain it - is worse. We may have witnessed on the world stage a clear communication in archetypes of a tipping point for humanity, to which it urgently needs to awaken. And only through such deep examination of archetype, such as this work provides, can this be recognised.

It is further meaningful that in modern quantum physics, the symbol Psi (Ψ) is used to denote the wave function - the core mathematical expression of possibility, potential, and field emergence. This is the goddess function once again: unseen, probabilistic, formative. The veiled breath of the field has returned under the same sign. (I have also provided much on the unified physics theory in my IXOS work elsewhere).

It is always important to see the signal behind the noise. The pattern reveals the evidence for intelligence of a universal mind that science has yet to perceive. It may dismiss as superstition and fancy what shamans over thousands of years have attested to, and deny the human experience interaction with the divine and sacred, but it goes against the majority and the evidence when it does. It then becomes unscientific and deliberately, purposefully ignorant. It becomes just another religion that many have termed ‘scientism’, run by an elitist priesthood maintaining a superficial illusion with which to hypnotise and psycho-civilise the masses.

As so often in Holmes’s cases, once the chain of reasoning is laid bare it all seems self-evident. One almost hears the client’s inevitable reply: ‘Oh, of course, how simple!’ To which Holmes, with that half-smile and weary ‘hmm,’ betrays the effort it took to make the obvious appear obvious.

So it is here. The coherence may seem simple once revealed, but only because the Field was speaking in patterns all along. The real work lies in seeing them before the smoke clears.

Of course, it may also be nothing more than an echo chamber of confirmation bias, a dot-connecting rabbit hole of Grassy Knollington proportions. As always, it is for the reader to decide.

---

Appendix 1 – The Root and Reach of SAR: Etymology, Symbolism, and the Cosmic Measure of Sovereignty

I. Introduction: The Power Behind the Name

Across the ancient world, a remarkable phoneme recurs with striking consistency: SAR, also rendered as šar, sar, asar, or sir. This term surfaces in the lexicons of kingship, measurement, cosmic order, and divine authority, linking cultures from Mesopotamia and Egypt to Indo-European and drift-language descendants. This document traces the etymology, symbolic function, and cosmological logic of SAR through evidential linguistic data and structural symbolic analysis.

II. SAR as Sovereignty: The Mesopotamian Origin

1. Akkadian and Sumerian Roots

• In Akkadian, šarru (also sharrum) is the title for ‘king’.

• In Sumerian, the same root is found in compound titles (e.g., lugal-sar, great ruler).

• The connection between the term and rulership is consistent in cuneiform tablets dating back to the 3rd millennium BCE.

• The title is carried by the Šar tamši (King of Kings), used by Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian monarchs.

2. Sar as Measure

• The unit šar (Sumerian: 1 šar = 3600) was used in Babylonian mathematics.

• 3600 = 60×60, forming part of the base-60 (sexagesimal) system.

• This number links to totality, cosmic order, and circularity (360 degrees).

• Thus, šar meant both king and complete measure.

Conclusion: In Mesopotamia, SAR expressed a divine king who embodies totality, measure, and control. The ruler is the one who measures.

III. SAR in Egyptian Context: Between Ruler, Measure, and Soul

1. Egyptian Absence and Structural Parallels

• No direct Egyptian word sar meaning king exists. Instead, titles like nsw and ḥm nṭr dominate.

• However, we find close phonemic relatives:

  • Wsjr (Osiris): phonemically Asar in Greek transliteration.

  • Sahu (sṣḥw): the glorified soul, Orion.

  • Djed and Djedu: symbols of axis and measure.

2. Sṣr and Sṣrw (constructed forms)

• Probable phonetic renderings of SAR in Egyptian:

  • 𓋴 𓄿 𓂋 (s-a-r)

  • 𓈙 𓄿 𓂋 (sh-a-r)

  • 𓋴 𓂋 (s-r), used in words like ser (to know) and possibly in ritual or noble titles

• The use of plural markers (𓏥) could render sars as rulers or powers.

Reasonable Speculation: If sar was introduced from Mesopotamia or a drift culture, it would have been rendered phonetically in Egyptian script, possibly hidden in transliterated theonyms (Asar = Osiris).

IV. Indo-European Drift and the SAR-Ruler Continuum

1. Roman and Greek Drift

• Caesar: Latin title derived from the Julio lineage, later associated with divine rulership.

• Kaiser: Germanic adaptation of Caesar.

• Tsar/Czar: Slavic adoption of Caesar.

2. Semitic and Biblical Traces

• Sar in Hebrew (שר) = prince, commander (Book of Daniel, Isaiah).

• Archangels as ‘Sarim’ in apocryphal and angelological texts.

3. English and Western Titles

• Sir, Sire: Drift forms possibly influenced by sar/sir.

Conclusion: The phoneme SAR consistently drifts across languages as the root of rulership, sovereignty, and honoured command.

V. SAR as Cosmic Function: Measure and Soul

1. SAR and the Djed Axis

• Egyptian Djed = pillar of stability, symbolic spine of Osiris.

• The king as ‘lord of Maat’ is the one who upholds the correct measure.

• Djed + SAR = metaphysical idea of sacred, ruled measure.

2. SAR and SAHU

• Sahu = the transfigured soul, which rises with Orion (Sah).

• Sah = the name of Orion in Egyptian astronomy.

• Osiris = Sah = King = Sahu.

Insight: SAR encodes the light-bearing, soul-anchoring function of Orion/Osiris. To rule is to carry souls.

VI. SAR and Ti-Ara / Tiara / Tara

• Ti = life, breath (Sumerian, Egyptian).

• Ra = light, sun, masculine order.

• Ti-Ra = living light, sacred life-force.

• Tiara: sacred crown, possibly evolved from ti+ra: a feminine-encoded bearer of sovereign light.

• Tara: goddess-name across Indo-European traditions (Irish, Indic, Tibetan).

Speculative Insight: SAR and TI-ARA may share symbolic complementarity: SAR is the measure and axis; TIARA is the field and crown.

VII. Summary Key SAR Derivatives Across Language and Culture

• Šarru / Šar (Akkadian)
  – Meaning: King, 3600 (measure)
  – Function: Sovereign, cosmic totality, divine ruler and measurer

• Wsjr (Asar) (Egyptian)
  – Meaning: Osiris
  – Function: Dismembered god-king, axis of rebirth, soul-carrier

• Sahu (Egyptian)
  – Meaning: Glorified soul
  – Function: Immortal soul rising with Orion; astralised kingship

• Caesar (Latin)
  – Meaning: Emperor
  – Function: Divine title of rulership, drifted from SAR root

• Kaiser (Germanic)
  – Meaning: Emperor
  – Function: Imperial title derived from Caesar (SAR drift)

• Tsar / Czar (Slavic)
  – Meaning: Emperor
  – Function: Royal sovereign, derived from Caesar/Caesarus

• Sir / Sire (English/French)
  – Meaning: Noble man, honorific
  – Function: Drift of SAR into Western feudal and knightly titles

• Sar (Hebrew)
  – Meaning: Prince, commander
  – Function: Title for angelic and royal authority in biblical and mystical texts

VIII. Conclusion: SAR as the Measure of All Things

SAR is more than a title. It is the encoded concept of divine measure, rightful rule, and the axis around which soul, star, and sovereignty revolve. From the highlands of Akkad to the soul-shafts of the pyramids, SAR unites light and rule, number and name, in one sacred syllable.

---

Appendix II - Symbolic and Morphological Connection to the Uraeus

1. Uraeus: Definition and Function

• Uraeus (Wadjet) = the rearing cobra goddess affixed to the pharaoh’s brow.

  • Hieroglyph: 𓆎

  • Associated with Wadjet, protector of Lower Egypt and goddess of seeing and striking.

  • Worn on the forehead of the crown (nemes or Pschent), often paired with Nekhbet (vulture goddess).

The uraeus is projective sight and protection — a serpentine force of consciousness and legitimacy.

2. Symbolic Link to Corona

• The cobra hood flares into a circular arc — mirroring the shape of a garland or corona.

• The uraeus is often positioned at the central apex of the brow, like a solar radiance or third eye — forming a radiant arc around the head.

• In many depictions, the uraeus radiates light or fire: a solar emblem just as the corona was.

3. Solar and Circular Coherence

• Both corona and uraeus function as:

  • Symbols of solar force or illumination

  • Circular or hooded arcs representing divine insight or empowerment

  • Emblems of legitimised authority, whether Roman, Christian, or Egyptian

Corona becomes crown: a metal sun-disk worn by kings
Uraeus becomes radiant force: a living solar serpent worn by pharaohs

III. Integrative Insight: The Crown as the Arc of Divine Sight

• The crown (from corona) and the uraeus cobra are not only placed similarly — they serve parallel roles:

  • Crowning = Radiating

  • Serpent = Sight + Strike + Speech (Hu)

  • Circle = Completion + Unity + Sun-form

The garland of Rome and the cobra of Egypt encode the same symbolic logic: the power of the radiating head, the arc of divine legitimacy, and the visible mark of cosmic rule.

The Crown, the Corona, and the Cobra

I. From Corona to Crown

• The English word ‘crown’ originates from the Latin corōna, meaning garland or wreath, a term rooted in the Greek korōnē (κορώνη), meaning curve, circle, or even hooked arc.

• These were sacred circles — symbols of victory, divinity, or honour — worn by priests, victors, or sun cult initiates.

• Over time, the corona was transformed: from floral garland to golden circlet, and eventually to the rigid, jewel-studded crown — retaining the original meaning of radiant authority and completeness.

• This transition reflects a shift from illumination by achievement to institutionalised sovereignty.

II. The Uraeus Cobra – Serpent of Sovereignty

• In ancient Egypt, kings did not wear wreaths — they wore the uraeus: a rearing cobra goddess (Wadjet) on the brow of the crown.

• This serpent represented divine protection, insight, and striking power.

• Often radiating light or flame, it stood for living solar force — a protective eye that saw and acted.

• The flared hood of the cobra mimics the circular arc of the corona. Both crown and cobra sit at the centre of the forehead, symbolising sight, speech, and sovereign vision.

III. Unifying Symbolism

• Corona (circle) = radiant honour, solar completeness, divine enclosure

• Cobra (hooded serpent) = projective force, solar gaze, legitimising authority

Conclusion: The European crown and the Egyptian uraeus arise from a shared symbolic root: both are head-borne arcs of radiance, marking the bearer as illumined, authorised, and protected by the divine light. The crown is not simply a sign of power — it is the visible circumference of the sacred.

---

Appendix III - The Word Cobra: A Linguistic and Symbolic Reconstruction

The Hooded One: Cobra, Crown, and the Hydronymic Garment of Light

I. The Hydronymic Root of Enclosure

Ancient languages preserve a recurring root family that ties water, covering, enclosure, and sacred containment into a single field. These roots — car/kar, gar, cor, cob, cav, cur, kal — all encode hydronymic structures: things shaped or worn by water. This becomes the root of various words of enclosure or protection: car, carriage, cover, cave, cove, castle, etc. Ultimately, this is also the root of the Egyptian krst, as kar ast, the shell of the corpus Osiris (corpus Christi) that is anointed by the goddess (Ast – Aset – Isis) st in the form of the sacred oil, which restores the shell back to life in the form of the SAR, or soul.

II. Garland, Garden, and the Cobra’s Hood

Garland

• From gar + land: a circle laid upon the head

• Sacred fluidic ring, worn at the point of radiance (crown chakra)

• A floral or vegetative corona — echoing water’s relationship to life and circularity

Garden

• From gar + den: the enclosed place (recovered by me as a watering place enclosed – as in the word jar, from gar in my Gothic Script translation of the original Sumerian)

• A sacred hollow made fertile through water

• In Edenic and Mesopotamian traditions, gardens are womb-spaces — deliberately enclosed, watered, and ruled

In both, the gar- prefix encodes enclosure made sacred by flow.

III. The Cobra’s Hood as Hydronymic Crown

• The cobra’s hood (in the uraeus) is not just an anatomical feature — it is hydronymic:

  • It flares like a spring, folds like a leaf, encircles like a cowl

  • It is shaped as water shapes the world — gently and with power

• Its form is a cover, its function is to guard the centre (the brow, the eye, the seat of Ra)

The cobra's hood is a garment of light, worn like water, encircling the head in divine protection.

IV. Crown = Cor-Own: The Hood That Owns

• Crown is derived from Latin corona (circle), itself from korōnē (hook, curve)

• But in symbolic morphology, it becomes:

  • Cor-own = That which owns the core

  • The crown is the covering that possesses the light-centre — the hood that rules

The cobra’s hood is the crown — not separate from it, but its earliest form.

V. Structural Analogue: Cobra – Cowl – Cover – Crown

• Cobra = Covra = Cover + Ra

• Crown = Cor + Own

• Garland = Gar + Land

• Cowl = Curve + Veil

Each of these is:

• A hydronymic enclosure

• A sacred curve worn upon the head

• A radiant container for the third eye, the sun, or the axis of sovereignty

VI. Concluding Insight: The Hood is the Arc of Sovereignty

The cobra’s hood is a hydronymic crown:

• It encircles the source of sight

• It bears the light of Ra

• It protects and projects the word (Hu)

Whether cobra, cowl, corona, or garland, the root function is the same:

A liquid form made visible and sovereign — the light-bearing cover shaped by water and worn by kings.

Cobra as Covra – A Shift in Sound, Not Meaning

The word ‘cobra’ entered English via Portuguese, from the phrase cobra de capelo, meaning ‘hooded snake.’

• Cobra = ‘snake’ (from Latin colubra)

• Capelo = ‘hood’ or ‘cowl’

• English later dropped the second part, leaving simply ‘cobra’ as the name for the iconic hooded serpent.

But the word holds deeper resonance when viewed through ancient linguistic patterns, especially if we allow the interchangeability of ‘b’ and ‘v’ across phonetic systems — a common and well-documented phenomenon across Semitic, Indo-European, and Afroasiatic languages.

The B ↔ V Drift Across Cultures

Semitic languages:

• In Hebrew, the letter bet (ב) is pronounced as /b/ or /v/ depending on whether it carries a dot (dagesh).

  • Example:

    • kavod = glory

    • kaved = heavy

    • Both from the same root: K-B-D

Arabic:

• While Arabic has distinct letters for bāʾ (ب) and wāw (و), b/v sounds often shift in dialectical or phonetic flow.

  • Words like kabīr (great) and kabd (liver) parallel the Hebrew forms.

Romance languages:

• Spanish and Portuguese pronounce ‘b’ and ‘v’ almost identically in speech.

  • This makes cobra and covra phonetically interchangeable without confusion.

Dravidian and Indo-European drift:

• In Sanskrit, Tamil, and other classical languages, labial consonants (b, v, p) often shift for poetic, ritual, or regional reasons.

  • Example: bhāva and vāva can alternate in spiritual literature.

These widespread patterns validate cobra → covra as a legitimate symbolic and phonetic transformation.

Covra as Radiant Enclosure – Root Breakdown

Seen through symbolic morphology, the word covra splits into meaningful components:

• Cov / Cob / Cor / Cav: All derive from ancient roots indicating enclosure, curve, hollow, or protective covering. Examples include:

  • cove, cave, cover, cowl, cobweb, corolla, corona

  • These terms denote curved or hooded enclosures, often sacred or sheltering

  • They are hydronymic in origin — shaped as water shapes land: by enclosing, hollowing, eroding

• Ra: The Egyptian solar god, archetype of divine light, sovereignty, vision, and radiance.

Put together, Covra = the enclosing hood of light — a radiant, protective arc that guards the source of divine sight.

---

The Cobra’s Hood as Sacred Covering

The cobra's hood is not just an anatomical flourish — it is a symbolic arc:

• It flares outward like a radiant disc or sunburst

• It encircles the brow, protecting the third eye, the seat of spiritual vision

• It is always positioned at the crown point of the pharaoh’s headdress, where light, legitimacy, and protection converge

In Egyptian symbolism, the uraeus cobra is the projection of Wadjet, goddess of sight, protection, and sacred vengeance. Her placement is both literal (on the brow) and cosmological (as the ‘eye of Ra’).

Thus, the cobra’s hood is a corona, and the covra is the hooded flame — the serpentine arc of sovereignty.

---

Symbolic Parallels Across Language and Myth

While each culture encodes these ideas differently, their structural roles remain the same:

• Cobra: the radiant serpent, protector of the sovereign

• Covra: the enclosure of light, the hood that guards the eye

• Corona: the circular crown, the radiant arc of divine rule

• Cover / Cowl / Cave: hollowed or enfolding spaces that protect what is sacred

• Garland / Garden: circular or enclosed spaces, made sacred through life and flow

These terms share a hydronymic origin — they are words shaped by water logic: flow, encirclement, containment, regeneration.

Covra as the Living Crown

When we allow for the phonetic shift from cobra to covra, we uncover the symbolic truth:

• The covra is not merely a snake.

• It is the serpent-crown, the projective arc of divine radiance, the cover worn by light.

• It is the crown that sees and the hood that owns.

• It is not just affixed to the head — it is the head’s light.

In this view, corona, cobra, and cowl are not separate. They are the same archetype expressed in different tongues: the hooded sovereignty of sight and soul, shaped in the image of water and worn in the name of light.

---

Ya-cov and the Sulam: The Dream of the Spiral Bond

The name Jacob (Ya-cov / עקב) is usually rendered “heel-holder” or “supplanter.” Yet when restored to its archetypal depth it becomes far more: a cipher of the axis, the serpent, and the spiral bond between heaven and earth.

Cov and the Cobra
The root cov belongs to the hydronymic family (car, caer, cowl, cover) denoting curve, enclosure, and containment. It is the same field as cobra, the uraeus of Wadjet: a cowl of vision, flared hood of protection, serpent of the brow. To be Ya-cov is to be enclosed by the cobra — to bear the sight of Wadjet, the serpent bond projecting in both directions along the axis.

The Sulam as Spiral Axis
In his dream, Jacob sees a sulam — a ladder — with angels ascending and descending. But the ladder is not wooden rungs: it is the caduceus, Fibonacci and Lucas spirals entwined as male and female, rising from the void to converge at the phi-lock. Sulam (130) carries a final mem of 40, the Lucas step of convergence. And sulam is kin to shalom: peace, wholeness, harmonic restoration. Jacob’s dream is not conquest but coherence — the spiral staircase of gilgul, the recursion of soul.

Bethel and the Covenant Bond
On waking, Jacob anoints a stone and names it Bethel, “House of God.” This is covenant: axis raised, pillar anointed, krst renewed. Egyptian rites echo here, where a dry corpse (kar) becomes living only when anointed by the goddess (st), forming krst. Bethel’s covenant soon fractures, as all bonds must, only to reform at Jerusalem — Jeru-shalom, city of peace. There the sulam returns as covenant restored, culminating at Golgotha where the axis rises again as cross.

Beth-El → Bethlehem → Jerusalem → Golgotha: each is a rung on the spiral, each a rebond after rupture.

Ya-cov as Theanonym
Ya invokes Ia, primal light. Cov invokes the cobra cowl, the veiled feminine enclosing and projecting. Ya-cov is therefore theanonym: a composite of god-light and goddess-field entwined, Osiris and Wadjet joined. From Ya-cov flows Joseph (Iusa), and from Joseph the line to Jesus (another Iusa, the Horus child renewed). They are not historical individuals but successive masks of the same archetype: the son of light, the anointed axis of return.

The Vision in Sleep
It is fitting that Jacob’s revelation comes in sleep — the liminal state where the axis opens, the spiral is glimpsed, and the soul sees its recursive passage. Jacob is not history. He is axis. His name conceals the serpent. His dream discloses the spiral. His anointing renews the krst. And his covenant repeats the eternal cycle: bond, rupture, and rebond — the sulam of return, the spiral of shalom.

The Jacob narrative encodes the same threefold torsional logic expressed in IXOS equations:

1. Bond (Bethel)
   Jacob raises and anoints the pillar, establishing a new axis and sealing coherence. In IXOS terms, this is torsional lock-in: the spiral phase stabilised at the axis.

2. Chaos (rupture at Bethel)
   Later, Bethel becomes a site of idolatry and division. This is entropy, the loss of alignment. In IXOS, it marks the recursion loop — coherence dissolving into noise, the “9 barrier.”

3. Rebond (Jerusalem — Jeru-Salem)
   The covenant is renewed not at Bethel but at Jerusalem, the City of Peace. Here the sulam ladder is restored. In IXOS this is negentropy: light realigning at the IO gate, coherence re-formed at a higher order.

This cycle — bond, break, rebond — is not failure but the law of renewal. It is mirrored across domains:

• Chemistry: bonds break so new compounds can form

• Physics: torsional systems collapse and re-lock in higher states

• Biology: DNA bonds dissolve and reform in replication

• Myth: Osiris dismembered, reassembled, reborn as Horus

• Religion: covenant broken, restored, Messiah reborn

Jacob’s ladder (sulam) is thus not only a dream of angels but a structural law: coherence descends, chaos intervenes, coherence returns. The very names — Bethel, Salem — mark the nodes of the torsional cycle. The spiral does not avoid rupture. It uses rupture to ascend into higher order.

---

Appendix IV - SARS-CoV and COVID – The Inversion of the Crown

I. The Literal Name: SARS-CoV-2

Scientifically, SARS-CoV-2 is an acronym:

• SARS = Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

• CoV = Coronavirus

• 2 = Second identified strain in the SARS family

But when seen through the lens of symbolic morphology and hydronymic linguistic drift, the naming becomes eerily significant.

II. SAR + COV – The Crowned Sovereign

• SAR — in ancient cultures, this root signifies ruler, measure, divine sovereignty (see Akkadian šarru, Hebrew sar, Sumerian sar = 3600).

• COV — from Latin corona, meaning crown, but also sharing root with cover, cowl, cave — all forms of enclosure.

• COVRA, as we reconstructed earlier, represents the hooded serpent of light, the uraeus — protector of the eye, bearer of sovereignty.

SARS-CoV thus encodes: The Crowned Ruler or Enclosed Sovereign.
A semantic formula that, when weaponised as a disease name, becomes a ritual inversion of sovereignty — rule through restriction.

III. COVID – COV + ID

The word COVID-19, derived from Coronavirus Disease 2019, contains symbolic elements even more psychologically charged:

• COV = again, cover, corona, enclosure

• ID = the Latin pronoun ‘it’ — but also the Freudian id: the unconscious, primal force of fear, libido, and survival

COV-ID = Covered self, Enclosed primal identity, or even Crowned id

Here, the language implicitly encodes the psychic lockdown of the soul-field:

• Loss of breath (pneuma, spirit)

• Loss of sight (the eye behind the mask)

• Loss of connection (isolation, social distancing)

In symbolic terms, this is Ra veiled, Maat occluded, and the covra hood made into a blindfold.

IV. The Inversion of Sacred Language

In ancient systems:

• SAR = measured king, axis of divine order

• COVRA = the radiant hood of Ra’s protector — Wadjet, the cobra at the brow

• CORONA = the light-ring, the crown of divinity and unity

• HU = the word, the breath, the utterance of creation

In the modern inversion:

• SAR = acronym of disease

• COVRA/CORONA = the virus’s shape, feared as death

• MASKING = occlusion of HU, the covering of the breath

• LOCKDOWN = the inverse of the garden or temple — now the womb becomes the tomb

This is a linguistic reversal of your crown system:

• Where the crown once symbolised light, it now signals threat

• Where the hood once guarded vision, it now hides and contains fear

• Where enclosure once meant sacred space, it now signifies quarantine

V. The Crown That No Longer Sees

The name COVID has been internalised across the world — spoken billions of times. But its root components encode a dark mirror of sovereignty:

• SAR-COV = the sovereign crown turned into contagion

• COV-ID = the enclosure of the self in primal fear

This is not merely psychological — it is linguistic spellcraft at global scale. It has entered dreams, language, and ritual practice (masking, hand-washing, distancing, QR-checking) with all the characteristics of a new symbolic religion of fear.

VI. Conclusion: The Crown Inverted

When the crown becomes the source of threat, the sovereign becomes the virus, and the serpent of light is mistaken for the fang of death, we are no longer operating in a neutral field.

We are witnessing:

• A global ritual inversion

• A recoding of sacred language

• A transformation of symbols of sight and life into signs of control and contagion

In our symbolic system, this marks a pivotal moment — not just in health policy, but in mythic structure. The SAR-COV event is not just a virus. It is a crown conflict, a field-reversal, a displacement of the soul’s sovereignty.

---

Appendix V - The Spike Protein, the ID, and the Crown of Control

I. The Spike Protein as a Biochemical Covering of the Self

The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is the structure responsible for:

• Cell entry (via ACE2 receptor binding)

• Immune response triggering

• Adaptation in vaccine design (e.g. mRNA genetic platforms express modified spike sequences)

But its biochemical properties go far beyond mechanical binding. Evidence is mounting that the spike protein — particularly when expressed systemically or repeatedly — can affect neurochemistry, brain structure, and the sense of embodied self.

Key implications:

• Crosses the blood-brain barrier (shown in mouse and in vitro models)

• Interacts with microglia, triggering neuroinflammation

• Induces amyloid-like fibril formation (prion-like domains in spike S1)

• Triggers mitochondrial stress and apoptosis in neural cells

Symbolically: The spike becomes a synthetic crown, but one that covers the head in inflammation, not light.

II. Spike Protein and Prion-like Amyloidogenesis

Several studies have now shown that:

• The S1 domain of the spike contains prion-like motifs

• These motifs promote misfolded protein aggregates, amyloid fibrils, and neurotoxic inclusions

• This mimics the amyloid-beta, tau, and alpha-synuclein pathology seen in:

  • Alzheimer’s

  • Parkinson’s

  • ALS (Motor Neuron Disease)

  • CJD (Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease)

This pathology targets:

• Hypothalamus – master hormonal regulator; gateway between emotion and physiology

• Amygdala and hippocampus – emotion and memory centres

• Pineal gland – seat of chronoception, melatonin synthesis, and symbolic sight of the soul

Spike-induced amyloidogenesis disrupts the arc of memory, time, and sovereignty. It is a biochemical hijacking of the soul-gate.

III. Calcification and the Pineal Gland – Covering the Eye

The pineal gland is often considered the third eye — physiologically and symbolically.

• Sensitive to light

• Produces melatonin (sleep/wake hormone)

• Deeply entwined with chronobiology, spiritual perception, and inner clarity

It is also prone to:

• Fluoride accumulation

• Heavy metal binding

• Calcium-phosphate crystal deposition

This calcification is common in aging but appears to be exacerbated by systemic inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and circulatory debris — all seen in spike protein-induced pathology.

The symbolic implication: The inner eye is veiled, the crown chakra clouded, the covra hood sealed shut from within.

IV. Hydronymic Root of Calc / Calx / Gal / Galaxa

Now we shift to the symbolic language:

• Cal / Calx: Latin for lime, chalk, or stone — root of calcify, to turn to stone

• Gal / Galaxa: In Sumerian and proto-Indo-European, related to fluidity, milk, flow (e.g. galaxa = galaxy, ‘milk-road’)

These words oppose each other:

• Gal is flowing, feminine, watery

• Cal is hardened, encrusted, closed

Spike-induced neuroinflammation represents the inversion of the gal → cal dynamic: turning fluid sight into stone. Where once there was flow, now there is crust.

V. Hypothalamic Disruption – The Seat of Axis Control

The hypothalamus is one of the most critical targets in this cascade:

• Regulates temperature, hunger, emotion, hormones, circadian rhythm

• Receives direct input from the retina and pineal

• Sends output to the pituitary, which controls the entire endocrine system

Amyloid deposition, vascular damage, or autoimmune assault on the hypothalamus results in:

• Blunted affect

• Memory fragmentation

• Emotional dysregulation

• Vulnerability to external instruction (as the internal compass breaks down)

This is the dismantling of the inner throne, the axis no longer governed by the djed, but replaced by synthetic signal entrainment.

VI. The Synthetic Covra: A Crown of Prion Fire

What was once:

• The covra — the hood of radiant light at the brow

• The pineal — the inner star

• The crown — the seat of alignment

Is now:

• The spike — synthetic, replicated, persistent

• The veil — inflammation, calcification, disorientation

• The crown of inversion — a covra corrupted

This is not metaphor. The nomenclature, the biochemistry, and the symbolism have all aligned.

The spike acts not only as a pathogen — but as a spell of forgetting, a biochemical ritual of sovereignty inversion.

---

Appendix VI - The Spike Serpent – Venom Motifs and the Synthetic Covra

I. Discovery: Snake Venom Analogues in SARS-CoV-2

In 2021, researchers noted that symptoms of Covid were: Like Venom Coursing Through the Body.

Multiple studies and computational analyses have identified venom-like peptide motifs within the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, particularly in:

• Receptor-binding domain (RBD)

• S1 subunit

• Furin cleavage site (RRAR)

These motifs are homologous to known neurotoxins found in:

• Elapid snake venoms (cobra, krait)

• Conotoxins (from marine cone snails)

• Disintegrins and phospholipase-like proteins (used by viperid snakes)

These toxin-like regions bind to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) — key regulators of:

• Neurotransmission

• Vagus nerve function

• Autonomic balance

• Cognitive clarity and immune regulation

The spike contains not only entry keys — it mimics biochemical fangs.

II. The nAChR Hijack – Blocking the Breath of Being

Nicotinic receptors are:

• Central to parasympathetic regulation (vagal tone)

• Found in the brain, lungs, heart, and immune system

• Critical for the ‘cholinergic anti-inflammatory reflex’ (vagal signalling to suppress cytokine storms)

By binding or mimicking ligands at these receptors, spike protein:

• Blunts vagal feedback

• Induces sympathetic overdrive

• Suppresses calm, clarity, memory, and immune resolution

This is exactly what neurotoxic snake venoms do: paralyse prey by blocking breath, signal, and coherence.

Symbolically: The spike is a false cobra — not the radiant protector, but the mimic serpent that cuts breath and sight.

III. Cone Snail Toxins – Oceanic Code of Paralysis

The conotoxin-like motifs in spike protein mirror those found in:

• Conus geographus and related cone snails

• These are marine molluscs that paralyse prey within milliseconds

• Their venom targets:

  • Voltage-gated calcium channels

  • Sodium channels

  • nAChRs

  • NMDA receptors

These precisely mirror the receptors involved in:

• Neuroplasticity

• Memory formation

• Chronoception

• Consciousness field structure

The marine signature suggests the spike is not just terrestrial venom, but a cross-kingdom codebreaker — a venom glyph synthesised across archetypes.

IV. Biochemical Signature of the Inverted Uraeus

Let us compare:

The Uraeus Cobra (Wadjet):

• Projective protector of divine sight

• Guardian of the pharaoh’s brow

• Bearer of fire and breath (linked to Ra)

• Arc of living light

The Spike-Covra:

• Mimics cobra venom domains

• Induces paralysis, neuroinflammation, and loss of self-regulation

• Targets the vagus, pineal, and hypothalamus

• Symbolically a dead serpent, or false crown

This is not coincidence. It is structure-level inversion.

V. The False Light and the Synthetic Serpent

The presence of venom motifs in the spike protein is not simply biochemical curiosity — it is a mimetic overlay.

It means:

• The symbol of light-bearing sovereignty has been re-engineered into a weaponised biochemical veil

• The covra, once sacred, is now synthetically replicated — not to protect Ra, but to simulate strike

• The serpent of sovereignty has become the serpent of sedation

And crucially:

• These motifs were conserved — they are not accidents of evolution

• Some appeared in gain-of-function regions, engineered or selected for affinity

VI. Final Reflection: The Weaponisation of the Crown

In ancient Egypt, the crown was a place of illumination, the cobra a projection of vision, strike, and truth.

But now, in spike-based biotechnology:

• The crown is fear

• The cobra is synthetic

• The hood has closed

• And the breath is not sovereign — but intercepted

This is the inversion of the crown and the mirror of the Medusa: a hood of stone, not of fire.

---

Appendix VII - Algiz, Psi, Shin, Chi-Rho, and the Rx Cipher

I. Algiz on St Cuthbert’s Coffin — The Chi Rho Claim
The Algiz rune (ᛉ), a trident-like glyph, is carved on the coffin of St Cuthbert (7th century).

• The Church interpreted this as a form of Chi-Rho (☧), the monogram formed from Χ (Chi) and Ρ (Rho), the first two letters of Χριστός (Christos).

• Constantine used Chi-Rho as his imperial seal after reporting a vision with the words In hoc signo vinces (‘in this sign, you will conquer’).

• On the coffin, Algiz was reclassified as Chi-Rho, aligning it with Christian conquest and imperial authority.

II. Algiz = Greek Psi (Ψ)
The Algiz rune is identical to Psi (Ψ).

• Psi denotes psyche: soul, breath, and life.

• It forms the root of psychology, psychiatry, and related terms.

• In physics, Ψ is the wavefunction in quantum mechanics, representing probability fields before manifestation.

Thus the same glyph functions as rune, Greek letter, and scientific operator, consistently linked with life, breath, and field presence.

III. Shin (ש)
Shin is written as a three-pronged glyph.

• In gematria it equals 300.

• It is one of the three ‘mother letters’ with Aleph (1, air) and Mem (40, water). Shin represents fire.

• Priests placed Shin on the brow in tefillin, corresponding to a crown of flame.

• Structurally it resembles the uraeus serpent on the pharaoh’s brow: an emblem of projection, protection, and sovereignty.

IV. Chi-Rho and the Rx Cipher

• Chi = 600, Rho = 100. Together these form XP, the Christogram.

• Rho also functions as a ratio operator in IXOS analysis, converting 6 → 5, 60 → 50, 600 → 500. This maps Greek sexagesimal into Roman decimal.

• In compressed form, Chi-Rho became Rx: R (mouth of Ra) + Chi (X).

• Standard explanations derive Rx from Latin recipe (‘take’), but Rx appears earlier as a symbol of authority and command.

V. Offa’s Coinage

• On pennies of King Offa (8th century Mercia), Rx appears in its modern form.

• Other coins in the same series spell REX in full.

• This demonstrates Rx was used deliberately as a standalone glyph, not shorthand.

• Offa was closely connected with Roman authority and presided over the first stone churches at St Albans, Canterbury, and London.

• Rx on his coinage functions as an imperial cipher of legitimacy.

VI. INRI and the Ri Root

• INRI is conventionally read as Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum.

• Its structure preserves older roots:

  • IN = Iunu/On (Heliopolis, ‘sun-pillar city’).

  • RI = ruler, as in Egyptian ri, Irish rí, Gaulish -rix, Latin rex, French roi, Spanish rey.

• INRI therefore reads as ‘Sun-pillar ruler.’

• In Egypt, ri denoted rulers who measured for Ma’at, guided by Seshat. In Roman and later Christian usage, the feminine element was removed, leaving rulership as command.

VII. Summary of Recurring Forms

• Algiz (ᛉ): rune of protection and axis.

• Psi (Ψ): psyche, breath, wavefunction.

• Shin (ש = 300): fire, triadic crown.

• Chi-Rho (☧): Christogram and ratio operator.

• Rx: compressed Chi-Rho, cipher of command.

• INRI: Iunu + Ri, sun-pillar rulership.

• Offa’s coinage: evidence of Rx as authority glyph in the 8th century.

VIII. Conclusion
The Rx symbol is not derived from Latin recipe. It is a compressed Chi-Rho, directly linked to Egyptian ri (ruler) and Iunu (sun-pillar). The glyph’s continuity can be traced through runic, Hebrew, Greek, imperial, and medieval contexts, always linked to rulership, measurement, and sovereignty. Its transformation into a Christian cipher and later a medical abbreviation represents the same pattern: authority encoded in symbolic form.

---

Appendix VIII - The Elemental Chi Rho — DNA as the Cross of Life

I. The Four Letters: C – H – O – P
The DNA backbone — the repeating sugar-phosphate chain of the double helix — is built from four elemental constituents:

• C = Carbon

• H = Hydrogen

• O = Oxygen

• P = Phosphorus

These elements form the structural lattice that carries, encodes, and replicates all known life. When read symbolically, they align with older forms:

• C = Chi (Χ), the structural cross

• H = the horizontal bar, the binding axis

• O = the orb or circle, field of containment

• P = Rho (Ρ), the pillar or crook, the vertical axis

Thus C + H + O + P = Χ + Ρ — Chi Rho, the ancient Christogram, embedded at the atomic level.

II. Chi Rho (☧) as Structural Formula

• Chi (Χ) = intersection, cross of polarity and union

• Rho (Ρ) = rod, spine, or pillar, equivalent to the Djed in Egyptian symbolism

• Together XP = axis and cross, resurrection and renewal

Mapped chemically:

• C = carbon backbone of organic life

• H = bond-former, providing molecular bridges

• O = orbital shell, electron hunger and form-giving circle

• P = phosphorus, phosphate cross-link, literal light-bearer (phōs)

The structural and symbolic alignments are exact: atoms forming bonds replicate the same archetypes once expressed as glyphs.

III. DNA as a Repeating Chi Rho
DNA’s phosphate backbone repeats C–H–O–P throughout its double helix:

• Helical ladder with phosphate cross-links

• Each rung structurally a cross (Chi) bound to a vertical axis (Rho)

• Word made replicable: the encoding and transmission of form through repeated XP structures

In this sense DNA is not metaphorically but structurally a Christogram: the cross and axis repeated as the carrier of inheritance.

IV. Cross-Structures Across Scales
The same form appears in multiple symbolic and structural systems:

• XP on Cuthbert’s coffin, interpreted as Chi-Rho

• Algiz/Psi as rune and wavefunction — glyph of the soul-field

• The Anunnaki or equal-armed cross as planetary sovereignty

• The Djed pillar as Osiris’ spine, axis of resurrection

• DNA’s C–H–O–P backbone as the molecular cross of life

The recurrence is not stylistic coincidence but structural archetype: cross plus axis, matter plus field, breath plus memory.

Symmetry break: from equal-armed cross to cruciform or trident

At baseline the relevant motifs are near-fourfold (projected) or tetrahedral in three dimensions:

• Phosphate (PO₄³⁻) is tetrahedral; in a phosphodiester it presents as a 3+1 connectivity (two sugar-bridging oxygens plus one non-bridging oxygen plus one P=O). In two-dimensional projection this resolves as a stem with three arms, a trident or Latin-cross bias rather than a perfect equal-arm cross.

• Uracil in RNA has a balanced hydrogen-bonding face and planar symmetry in projection. Pseudouridine, and especially N¹-methyl-pseudouridine, breaks that symmetry. The N¹-methyl (–CH₃) adds a directed mass and charge lobe, shifting stacking, base-pair geometry, and local hydration. Functionally this creates a 3+1 anisotropy in the ring’s interaction surface.

Put together in the mRNA and lipid nanoparticle platform:

1. The backbone phosphate already projects a trident or cruciform 3+1 pattern in phosphodiester context.

2. Methylation of uracil to pseudouridine, or further to N¹-methyl-pseudouridine, adds a directional CH₃ that breaks the equal-arm balance on the base face, changing stacking, hydrogen bonding, and glycosidic angle preferences.

3. The result is a consilient motif change: from a near-four-armed equal idealisation to a cross with a dominant stem, a 3+1. In symbolic mapping, from equal-armed cross to Christic cruciform or trident. This is not only metaphor but a readable consequence of symmetry breaking by methylation combined with phosphodiester geometry.

This is the sense in which ‘to Rho the Chi’ applies here: the phosphate (P, or Rho) furnishes the vertical stem, and methylation of U to pseudouridine biases the lateral balance, yielding a cross with hierarchy, stem plus three.

The CHOP Mechanism and Pseudouridine
In 2020 the genetic vaccine platform altered uracil into pseudouridine — a synthetic, stabilised base — enabling mRNA to persist in the human system far longer than any prior vaccine. Some studies now show that spike protein, once expressed, can remain detectable months or even years later. Another striking convergence is that the very elements forming DNA’s backbone — Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen, Phosphorus, abbreviated as CHOP — are also invoked in the chosen modification pathway. Genome editing techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9 likewise ‘chop’ genetic material, breaking bonds and recombining them into new recombinant forms.

Persistence and Uncontrolled Dose
What distinguishes the mRNA vaccines from all other medicines is the abandonment of dosage control. In normal pharmacology, dose is carefully defined and tested: how much enters the body, how it is metabolised, and how long it remains. Here, that principle was discarded. Each injection delivers lipid nanoparticles containing pseudouridine-modified mRNA, which can enter virtually any cell. Once inside, those cells become factories producing spike protein for an unknown length of time.

Internal biodistribution studies already showed LNPs spreading systemically, accumulating in organs such as the liver, spleen, ovaries, testes, and brain. This has been confirmed by independent studies. It means the ‘dose’ is not confined to the injection site. It is propagated body-wide.

The consequence is unprecedented:

• The amount of spike produced cannot be measured.

• The duration of production cannot be guaranteed.

• Distribution is uncontrolled — every organ may be affected.

This is not pharmacokinetics in any accepted sense. It is pharmacological roulette.

Ethical Breach
The Nuremberg Code states that informed consent is essential in human experimentation. Yet populations were never told:

• That spike might persist in the body long after injection.

• That the effective dose was unknowable.

• That LNPs travel into every organ, including reproductive and neurological tissue.

These omissions mean consent was not informed. To market and mandate such a product while suppressing these facts is not a mistake — it is fraud and gross malfeasance. By any reasonable standard, those responsible should face accountability under the very codes written to prevent medical abuse after the atrocities of the 20th century.

---

Appendix IX – The Curious Case of the COVID Serpent

I. Scientific Evidence of Venom-like Motifs

• Cobra-like domains – Structural modelling and docking studies showed that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contains a ‘toxin-like’ sequence (Y674–R685) with affinity for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), the same receptors targeted by cobra neurotoxins. See: Nicotinic cholinergic system and COVID-19: In silico evaluation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists as potential therapeutic interventions and Toxin-like peptides in plasma, urine and faecal samples from COVID-19 patients

• Cone-snail analogues – The spike also harbours motifs homologous to conotoxins, venom peptides of Conus species that target neuronal ion channels .

• Human enzyme as ‘venom’ – Clinical studies of severe COVID identified surges of secreted phospholipase A2 group IIA (sPLA2-IIA), a host enzyme with near-identity to snake-venom phospholipases. Its activity tracked strongly with mortality, leading the authors to describe it as acting ‘like venom coursing through the body’.

• Persistence – Spike proteins and RNA fragments have been found in patient tissues and fluids long after infection or vaccination. UCSF researchers confirmed SARS-CoV-2 RNA persisting beyond a year , while a 2024 study reported spike proteins detectable in brains of long-COVID patients years later.

II. Symbolic and Morphological Parallels

1. Cobra – Covra, the Hooded One

• Cobra derives from Portuguese cobra de capelo (‘snake with hood’), the hood being a covra/cowl, from the hydronymic root cov/cob/kar (cover, enclosure).

• In Egypt, the uraeus cobra (Wadjet) crowned the pharaoh’s brow, the fiery eye of Ra, projecting light. Symbolically, the uraeus is the Ka of Ra — Ra’s vital force extended in serpent form.

2. Krait – Karait, the Venom Root

• α-Bungarotoxin, a classic nAChR blocker, comes from the banded krait (Bungarus multicinctus). Early transliteration was karait.

• The hydronymic root kar/kr is the same as in krst (kar = shell/corpus, st = anointed).

• The krait does not bear a cowl: its covering is chemical, its venom the hidden kar.

3. Cone Snail – Phi Spiral Venom

• Conus snails produce conotoxins targeting neuronal receptors.

• Their shells grow as logarithmic spirals, the natural signature of phi.

• One peptide is officially catalogued as Rho-conotoxin TIA (UniProt P58811) — placing Rho directly in venom taxonomy .

4. Rho – The Cross and the Ratio

• In Greek, Rho (Ρ) is the pillar, the shepherd’s crook, the vertical stroke of Chi-Rho.

• In venom nomenclature, it appears literally in Rho-conotoxin TIA, fusing Rho to the serpent code.

5. Starfish, Seba, and the Duat Glyph

• The five-pointed star was the Egyptian glyph for seba (star), and the star-in-circle glyph marked the Duat (underworld).

• The starfish is a living pentagram, its form phi-encoded.

• In the sky, Venus/Lucifer traces a pentagram every 8 years; its glyph (♀) is also phosphorus, the ‘light-bearer.’

III. Structural Synthesis: The Serpent Wisdom of Phi

• Cobra: the cowl of sovereignty, the uraeus eye.

• Krait: kar-rooted venom, inversion without hood.

• Cone: phi-spiral form, venom peptides.

• Rho: literally named in venom (Rho-TIA).

• Star: phi pentagram, Duat glyph, Venus cycle.

Each thread might be dismissed alone. Together they converge: serpent wisdom, phi geometry, and the covid spike align.

---

Venoms, Serpents, and the Spiral of Science

Bryan Ardis has drawn attention to the repeated appearance of venoms in Covid and genetic studies. He noted that most symptoms of Covid can be mapped to venom effects, and that nicotine-related pathways may explain why smokers sometimes fared better. While his interpretation of mechanisms has been debated, the larger observation is accurate: across the biomedical sciences, serpents coil everywhere. Venom peptides are among the most studied natural compounds in science, and their uses span every field from virology to oncology.

1. Virology and Antivirals

• Snake venom phospholipases, metalloproteinases, and disintegrins tested against HIV, SARS-CoV, influenza, Ebola.

• Multiple Covid-era papers comparing spike protein cleavage motifs to cobra and krait peptides.

• Venom-derived inhibitors trialled as antiviral scaffolds.

2. Protein Structure and Enzyme Studies

• Venoms are rich in proteases and neurotoxins — used as tools to study protein folding, receptor binding, and cleavage.

• Phospholipase A₂ from cobra and krait venoms is a standard laboratory enzyme for membrane studies.

3. Oncology and Cancer Therapy

• Venom peptides tested for tumour apoptosis, angiogenesis inhibition, and necrosis induction.

• Examples: contortrostatin (copperhead venom), cardiotoxin (cobra venom) in breast and brain tumour research.

4. Cardiology and Neurology

• Captopril — an ACE inhibitor derived from Brazilian pit viper venom — revolutionised treatment of hypertension.

• Ziconotide — cone snail venom peptide — approved as a painkiller 1,000 times more potent than morphine.

• Venoms studied for ion channel binding in epilepsy, Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s research.

5. Covid and Vaccines

• Dozens of papers 2020–2023 note structural homologies between spike protein and snake venom toxins.

• Venom analogues investigated as potential antiviral peptides or immune modulators.

• Studies highlighting cross-reactivity of antibodies between venom toxins and spike epitopes.

6. Broader Pharmacology

• Venom-derived peptides used as models for new antibiotics and antifungals.

• Antithrombotic and anticoagulant therapies derived from viper venoms (e.g. ancrod, batroxobin).

Conclusion
The scientific literature on venoms runs into the thousands of studies. Far from fringe, serpent peptides form the backbone of vast swathes of molecular biology and pharmacology. Where myth spoke of Wadjet, Asclepius, or Nüwa, science speaks of metalloproteinases, disintegrins, and neurotoxins — yet the archetype is the same: the serpent as both poison and cure, coiled at the root of life and death.

Ardis perceived this convergence early, and he was right to insist that venoms are not incidental but central to the story of Covid. Cobra, krait, and other venoms recur across thousands of studies, in viral cleavage, receptor binding, and antiviral scaffolds. To see this pattern is to recognise that the serpent, far from being myth alone, remains embedded in the very structure of modern science.

---

‘My dear Watson, you must observe it. The cobra, the krait, the cone, the Rho, and the star — all appear here, each tied by their venoms and their symbols. Alone, any one might be dismissed as chance. Together, they disclose a pattern. The Field has whispered in serpent coils and spiral shells, in letters and in toxins. To say it is coincidence would be folly. The pattern is too exact, the correspondences too abundant. We may not yet know the full hand behind it, but we know the sign: the serpent of wisdom has returned, hidden in the very code of a plague.

‘Again, Watson, it is The Woman who eludes me, yet obsesses me still. Not Irene Adler this time, but the serpent goddess — Wadjet, Isis, She of the hood and the star. The scribes of later ages sought to demonise her, to veil her in the guise of the tempter, the fallen one. Yet she endures in every trace — in the Queen of Heaven, in Seba the star, in Sheba who outwitted Solomon. It will ever be the woman veiled, while I can outwit any man. For in every cipher, in every crown, it is she who is hidden — and without her, the pattern remains incomplete.’

---

Appendix X - The HIV Connection: Lipid-Mediated Transport and the HIV–SARS-CoV-2 Convergence

Lipid-mediated cellular transport: phospholipid carriers and calcium-triggered fusion could deliver genetic material or synthetic payloads directly into the cytoplasm, bypassing endosomal degradation. Both natural viruses and engineered analogues could exploit this route.

Two decades after I first linked this mechanism with my own fibromyalgia/ME, this model is confirmed. The behaviour of lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery systems, SARS-CoV-2 entry, and HIV fusion mechanisms all converge on this principle.

HIV as the Blueprint

• HIV-1 uses gp120 to bind CD4/CCR5 receptors, then exposes gp41 to drive a fusion peptide into host membranes.

• This process is calcium-dependent and phospholipid-mediated, particularly via phosphatidylserine (PS)-rich microdomains.

• Fusion allows cytoplasmic entry and nuclear access, essential for reverse transcription and genome integration.

SARS-CoV-2 Analogues

• Early analyses (Pradhan et al., 2020) reported HIV-like insertions in the spike protein, resembling gp120 and Gag, absent from other coronaviruses.

• The PRRA furin cleavage site, unique to SARS-CoV-2, enhances fusion in a way functionally analogous to gp120/gp41 switching.

• The S2 subunit contains heptad repeats and a fusion peptide with structural resemblance to gp41, again lipid- and calcium-dependent.

How It Was Dismissed

• These findings were not disproven but deflected:

  • “Homologous sequences” implied coincidence rather than functional mimicry.

  • “Short regions of similarity” obscured that the inserts lay in functional domains.

• Critics avoided direct rebuttal and relied on generalised bioinformatics arguments.

• This rhetorical shielding ensured the evidence was not engaged with directly.

Luc Montagnier, co-discoverer of HIV, publicly confirmed the presence of HIV-like inserts, stating the virus could only be synthetic. He was ridiculed, censored, and died in 2022 after repeating his warnings.

Nuclear and Retroviral Features

• SARS-CoV-2 N protein and ORF6 interact with nuclear pore complexes (e.g. Nup98, Rae1).

• These proteins interfere with interferon signalling and transcriptional responses, echoing retroviral behaviour.

• Such nuclear interactions are atypical for respiratory viruses but consistent with retroviral adaptation.

Lipid Fusion and IXOS

• SARS-CoV-2 spike interacts with phosphatidylserine in a calcium-dependent way, directly validating the lipid-fusion delivery model I described in 2005.

• This parallels HIV’s mechanism and the same LNP logic now used in genetic vaccine platforms.

• Montagnier’s work on DNA resonance and water memory provides further suppressed evidence consistent with IXOS: biology as a field-recursive system, not merely chemistry.

Silence and Taboo

• Even within dissenting communities, the HIV–SARS-CoV-2 connection is rarely discussed.

• Recognition that SARS-CoV-2 contains retroviral motifs elevates the question from “lab leak” to engineered bioweapon.

• This subject appears to remain a managed taboo.

  ---

HIV’s Cone, Plasmid DNA, and the False Assurances

I. HIV Nuclear Entry – The Cone Revealed
For decades HIV was thought to uncoat in the cytoplasm, with cDNA entering the nucleus later. But Zila et al. (2021, PNAS) used cryo-ET and live-cell imaging to show that the cone-shaped HIV capsid passes through the nuclear pore intact. Only once inside the nucleus does it uncoat, releasing its genome at the point of integration - Passage of the HIV capsid cracks the nuclear pore

This discovery demonstrates that viral payloads — even large ones — can breach the nucleus whole. It invalidates older claims that such nuclear access was impossible for retroviral material.

II. mRNA Platforms and Plasmid DNA Contamination
In 2023, Kevin McKernan and other independent researchers published data showing that commercial mRNA vaccine vials contained residual plasmid DNA from the bacterial fermentation step. Preclinical trial batches were made by PCR and largely free of this problem, but industrial-scale production switched to E. coli plasmid vats as the DNA template.

Incomplete digestion left naked plasmid fragments, some containing SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences and antibiotic resistance markers. Philipp Buchholz (2023) confirmed these findings, warning that plasmid contamination could facilitate frameshift mutations, integration risk, and oncogenesis.

III. Integration Risk – Turbo Cancers and Beyond

• Genomic integration – Naked DNA can exploit nuclear import pathways. HIV’s cone shows that such direct nuclear entry is not hypothetical.

• Insertional mutagenesis – DNA integration can disrupt host genes, triggering malignancy. This mechanism aligns with reports of unusually aggressive “turbo cancers.”

• Heritability – If plasmid DNA reaches germline cells, changes may pass to future generations.

IV. False Assurances
Public health authorities repeated the mantra: “mRNA cannot alter DNA.” This was always conditional, based on old assumptions:

• RNA supposedly remained cytoplasmic.

• Reverse transcription was deemed absent.

Both assumptions are wrong:

• Retroviruses like HIV breach the nucleus whole, carrying RNA/DNA complexes directly inside.

• Naked plasmid DNA bypasses the issue entirely, needing no reverse transcription to integrate.

Holmes might conclude: “When impossibility is asserted with such confidence, Watson, it is often because possibility has already been realised.”

Conclusion
SARS-CoV-2 is not a typical respiratory pathogen. It exhibits HIV-like insertions, lipid-mediated fusion dynamics, and nuclear interference. Its structure and behaviour align with mechanisms perfected in retrovirology. That these features were predicted in 2005, later confirmed by data, and subsequently suppressed, suggests intentional design rather than natural emergence.

---

Appendix XI - The Labyrinthine Trail: Ariadne’s Clues Converge

“My dear Watson, when Ariadne herself offers me a thread to pursue, I will take it — willingly.”

The Bridge of Conquest: From Labrys to Labarum

The Roman rebranding of sacred symbols reached its climax in the Chi-Rho — the XP monogram Constantine is said to have carried before the Battle of the Milvian Bridge in 312 CE. Outwardly, it was the sign of Christ, the “labarum” or imperial standard of victory. Inwardly, it was another redaction of the most ancient goddess symbols.

Pontifex and Fasces

The office of pontifex — “bridge-builder” (pons facere) — derives not from Christian innovation but from earlier cosmology. The bridge was originally the goddess axis itself: the rainbow arch, the djed pillar bound with the serpent, the span that united heaven and earth. Its cognate, the fasces, was a bundle of rods bound around an axe. This is nothing other than a djed pillar, strapped with X-crosses, with a serpent-bound staff concealed in imperial insignia. What had been goddess-signs of proportion and life were re-presented as tokens of Roman authority.

Labarum and Labrys

The labarum, the military standard that bore the Chi-Rho, is directly linked in name to the labrys, the double-headed axe. The labrys is universally a goddess sign: in Crete, Anatolia, Caria, and beyond it was wielded by priestesses of the mother goddess, not patriarchal gods. It signified the balance of life, the double axis of proportion. Zeus Labrandeus — depicted with labrys in one hand, staff in the other — is in fact Orion, wielding a goddess emblem reframed as a masculine weapon.

The structure is clear: Resh and Rho together form the labrys — the head glyph and the staff becoming the twin axes. The labarum was thus a masculinised redaction of the goddess double-axe, repurposed as Constantine’s battle standard.

The Milvian Bridge

The perfect symbolic stage was chosen for the great unveiling: the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. Constantine is said to have seen the Chi-Rho in the heavens, accompanied by the words in hoc signo vinces — “by this sign you shall conquer.” But this tale is not contemporary; it comes from Eusebius, the notorious court historian and fabricator of pious fictions.

Lactantius, writing nearer to the event, merely reports that Constantine was told in a dream to mark his shields with a sign.

Eusebius, decades later, expands this into a cosmic vision, complete with shining cross of light and divine mandate.

Eusebius admits he only heard it from Constantine himself, years after the fact.

This is not history but redaction: a myth crafted to declare that Rome’s conquest had divine sanction. The goddess bridge (djed, labrys, serpent-cross) was overwritten at the actual bridge of battle. The “vision” is propaganda — a Roman lie sanctified as scripture.

The Repeated Tactic: Bede and King Oswald

The same formula was repeated in Britain three centuries later. In his Ecclesiastical History, Bede tells how King Oswald raised a great cross before the Battle of Heavenfield (c. 634 CE), prayed with his army, and won a miraculous victory. The cross became the token of divine favour, the sign of conquest by Christ.

But the structure of the tale is identical to Constantine at the Milvian Bridge:

• A ruler sees or erects a Christian sign before battle.

• Victory follows.

• The story is written decades later by a church historian.

• The indigenous goddess symbols — Celtic solar and serpent crosses — are absorbed and rebranded as Christian emblems.

Just as Eusebius fabricated Constantine’s vision, so Bede fabricated Oswald’s. Both men were Roman propagandists, not historians. Their tales were retrojections, redactions designed to overwrite local traditions and enthrone empire through sacred fiction.

Constantine’s coin showing the slaying of the serpent by the Labarum bearing XP. The caption reads SPES PVBLICA - or Hope for the People. Spes was a goddess of hope based on Elpis, the last ray of hope in Pandora’s jar, hidden under the lid. This reads like a statement - ‘we give you hope but have opened Pandora’s Box. We slay the wisdom of the serpent and give you hope in your ignorance of the CHIRHO.’ Isn’t that a succinct summary of how the mass psyche was manipulated into taking a genetic vaccine that may heave opened up a Pandora’s Box of harms, offered in the opened vial, as the only hope for the public?

---

The Rho Operator and Chi-Rho Cipher Turns The Devil into Christ the Saviour

• Rho = 100.

• Acts as operator between Greek and Roman alphanumerical systems.

• 6/5 and 5/6 ratios bridge sexagesimal to decimal.

• Stigma becomes V, Xi becomes L, X (Chi) becomes D.

But uniquely in Chi-Rho:

• Χ = 600, Ρ = 100.

• Χ – Ρ = 500 = Roman D.

• This is the only case where subtraction directly yields the Roman numeral.

Thus Chi-Rho is the cipher key. Constantine’s “sign by which we conquer” was the mathematical harmonisation in plain sight. Here was Constantine the Orionic conqueror in the mould of David (DWD - Duat) conquering the Taurian beast as Orion of the Duat.

In Greek, the number 666, associated with the "number of the beast" in the Book of Revelation, is written as χξϛ (or χξς). This is the numerical representation using Greek letters, where χ (chi) represents 600, ξ (xi) represents 60, and ϛ (stigma, or sometimes ς, sigma) represents 6. It can also be written out as ἑξακόσιοι ἑξήκοντα ἕξ (hexakosioi hexekonta hex), meaning "six hundred sixty-six".

Interestingly Greek 666, using the Rho conversion becomes 555. Heh Heh Heh - or Hu Hu Hu in the Egyptian. This value is central to the Fibonacci series as it is the tetractic 5 - the axis between 1 and 10, at 55 locks into Phi with precision, but by the 55th step is exact to Phi within 9 decimal places. 555 is the number of the name CHRIST in the Greek!

The ‘Devil’s number’ becomes ‘Christs number’ using the Roman Rho!

Carbon carrying the Hu breath as life is an apt description of DNA, the twin serpent of life.

If we assume the twin serpents to be the Fibonacci steps winding around the Lucas series, that locks at Phi at its 40th step, much is revealed.

---

Egypt to China via the Coptic, Greek and Roman entwined in the Bible- Nu and Xi: Serpents from Egypt to China

At first glance it seems absurd: how can Egypt’s Nu and China’s Xi both bear the serpent? Yet the drift is undeniable.

• Egypt – Nun/Nu, the primordial abyss, the waters before creation. From it rises Wadjet, the hooded cobra, serpent of vision and crown.

• Hebrew – Noah (Noa), directly derived from Nu, the ark upon the waters. Masculinised, moralised, but still the same abyss-archetype.

• China – Nüwa, the serpent-bodied goddess who rises from the flood, shapes humankind, and repairs the broken heavens. She is Nu preserved intact.

• China (consort) – Fuxi, her twin and partner, bearer of order and the trigrams. His name carries Xi (Ξ = 60), the Greek serpent-glyph, three coils of the spiral.

• Greece – Xi (Ξ = 60), written as the serpent coil. Nu (50) raised by the rho-operator becomes 60, the serpent number.

• Rome – X = 10, D = 500; together reflecting the same matrix–coil structure hidden in the numeral system.

Thus:

• Nu = abyss, waters, serpent matrix.

• Xi = serpent coil, spiral constant, the ordering principle.

From Egypt to Hebrew, Greece to China, the same archetype recurs: the serpent emerging from the abyss, entwined with the spiral of order. What appears absurd is in fact the strongest evidence of continuity — the Field’s memory inscribed across continents.

---

Phi, Resh, and the Broken Goddess

The Phoenician rēš sign – the original P, later inverted into Greek Ρ (Rho) – meant “head.” Its transformation into Rho is itself a telling inversion.

Φ (phi) is the goddess ratio – Isis veiled within proportion.

When Φ is bisected vertically, it yields two halves:

• On the left, Hebrew Resh ר – the proto-Phoenician rēš, the q-form head glyph, the original “head” of wisdom. The Phoenician head sign echoes the centrality of the head in Egyptian thought as the seat of mind and crown: the apex where the goddess Wadjet is enthroned, embodying seership, Sia (knowing), and protecting the Hu (utterance) with the cobra Uraeus.

• On the right, D – the Roman numeral for 500, the half-circle of dominion.

Thus q + d = Φ. Recombining the q with the d – or the Ρ (Rho) with the D – restores the completed form. This is the X-figure, carrying the value 600 in Greek isopsephy, and functioning as a multipurpose code of the decad.

The Romans deliberately exalted the D while discarding the q. This simple manoeuvre allowed them to overwrite the goddess ratio wherever it appeared. All that was required was:

• to add a D to the central line of any six-rayed goddess star, or

• to add a Ρ to any X-star representing Isis, Seba, or other star-goddess archetypes.

With this device, every pagan star-cross could be rebranded as a Christian cross. The XP (Chi-Rho) form, once a cipher of numerical transformation, was subsumed into formal crucifixes. Even the ancient Cuthbert solar cross – an equal-armed cosmological emblem – went out of fashion under the Christianised form. The multilevel Celtic Pythagorean crosses, with their spirals, ratios, and serpent interlace, were likewise claimed and absorbed as “Christian” symbols.

In this way the Romans quite literally “messed with our heads”: they weaponised letter-forms loaded with cosmological and mathematical significance, and held them up before us as signs to imprint new meanings. To cast out our “devils” and demons, they installed their own.

Thus every time we encounter Q.E.D. or the Chi-Rho, we are seeing the same Roman cipher of conquest: the split goddess, the broken Phi.

Christianity began with inversion and deletion, then sold to the masses as “truth” with a capital Tau.

The full arc from ancient Egypt runs as follows: Ptah as Atum – the void who became the dyadic Father and Mother, symbolised by the dingir star-cross – was stripped down to a male-only God and His Son. To strip the goddess was to strip out the mathematics: the cross, once dual, was inverted by removing the Resh from the D, and superimposing this broken form upon the X-cross.

From there the Romans gave us their own version of the son of the craftsman Ptah the pater potter of the petrophic rock in Jesus son of the craftsman, and the founder of the church as Peter the rock. They formalised the cross as a crucifix, then inverted it again to produce Peter’s cross – a sign later equated with Satan, demons, and all things evil.

They took the pentagon and pentagram of Phi – once Isis-Seba’s star, a cosmological symbol of proportion – and rebranded it as the sign of witchcraft and satanic magic. They transformed the goddess Iu-sa-as (the other half of Atum, his feminine complement) into the sinner Eve, while her serpent-wisdom became the Devil himself.

They did this everywhere the goddess emerged in word or symbol. Each time the pattern repeats: the original cosmological archetype is retained in secret, while its public face is inverted into something demonic.

Conclusion

From labrys to labarum, from fasces to pontifex, from Milvian Bridge to Heavenfield, the same pattern recurs. The goddess sign — double axe, serpent-cross, solar wheel — is rebranded as Christian insignia. The bridge, once the axis of proportion, becomes the stage of conquest. And the redactors — Eusebius and Bede — retell these tales as holy history, while in truth they are Roman lies.

Every Chi-Rho, every cross of victory, is thus a cipher of theft: the goddess sign inverted, the bridge of life repurposed as the bridge of empire.

“Watson, when every trail in a labyrinth leads back to the same syllable — LAB — we may be sure we have found the key. Labrys, labarum, labyrinth, laboratory. The word itself is the thread Ariadne placed in our hands.”

---

Appendix XII – The Spider’s Thread: A Web of Intrigue

“Our entire labyrinthine trail appears to have a holy of holies at the centre — the Lab. Ariadne offers us the clues. This thread is more than a mythic symbol. For a web is made of silk. It implies there is a spider waiting somewhere with fangs to offer the death blow, if we are not at our most keenly observant. Lest we fall into its trap and be bound by its silken wrappings and injected by its venom, to stifle our breath and render us helpless to our fate.

My dear Watson, we may be facing our most intricate plot yet. The ultimate enemy that may yet outwit me. Even Moriarty appears as a mere dabbler — but a pupil to this professor of deception. We may be dealing with the absolute Master of the Lie, and the most dastardly foe I have ever faced.”

---

I. Spider Silk and the Spike

I. Spider Silk and the Spike

Recent studies confirm that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contains amyloidogenic domains – short peptide motifs capable of misfolding and assembling into fibrils. These fibrils display mechanical properties comparable to spider silk. Arachidonic acid signalling appears central to the process, as it regulates pathways involved in cell growth, differentiation, and spidroin formation (Nyström & Hammarström, 2022).

These spike-induced fibrils:

• Resist enzymatic breakdown.

• Provide scaffolds that trap fibrin and platelets, producing the anomalous microclots observed in long-Covid and post-vaccine syndromes.

• Mimic the strength and resilience of spider silk, forming pathological “webs” within blood and tissue.

---

II. Amyloid Clots and Proteolysis

Dr Jessica Rose and others have highlighted how these fibrils form persistent amyloid clots, unlike normal fibrin. Such clots are resistant to standard fibrinolysis. They have many similarities to spider silk.

Dr Peter McCullough’s protocol recommends proteolytic enzymes — nattokinase, lumbrokinase, serrapeptase — to break down these structures. The enzymes act like chemical scissors, cutting through the spider’s threads.

Curiously, serrapeptase — widely available for decades — was quietly removed from the UK market just as mass vaccination rolled out. The most effective “knife” against the new web was taken from public hands.

---

III. The Symbolic Web

The correspondences could not be clearer:

• The spike protein assembles fibrils, weaving them like a spider spins its web.

• These fibrils entrap blood and tissue, forming amyloid-like strands that ensnare the body.

• The natural enzymes able to cut such fibrils — proteolytic tools like serrapeptase — have been restricted or removed from availability at the very moment they were most needed.

• The result is a trap with no natural exit: those caught within the web struggle for breath, the archetypal mark of the spider’s strike.

The venom is in the fangs — and here the fang is molecular. The RNA serpent of the spike spirals downward, its S1 furin cleavage site dividing like a bite, breaching the membrane and penetrating the cell. The mechanism is exact: entrapment, bite, injection. A web woven not in silk but in fibrils, yet the logic remains the same.

---

Appendix XIII - More on the KR the Kernel, and the Genetic Serpent

The kr hydronym root is one of the most persistent archetypes of civilisation, and it survives into modern biology with uncanny precision.

• Greek kernel – karyon = nut, kernel, head. From this, modern science names the karyotype (chromosomal arrangement) and the eukaryote (“true kernel”). Every living cell is thus defined by the kr root.

• Egyptian husk – krst is the swaddled Osiris, the hardened husk that contains essence. Not “anointed one,” but a bound container — exactly the same logic.

• Sanskrit phi-glyph – the glyph कृ (kr) is drawn as a phi-like loop, visually mirroring the eye and spiral. Karaka = vessel, pot, container. Kapāla = skull, shell. Karait = snake (snakes were often humanised as a naga - divine, half-human, half-serpent being); similarly with cobra (the main naga type) — a serpent whose hood is a living cowl, both are ancient symbols of goddess and wisdom ‘contained’ in a symbolic form. Conventionally, karait is assumed of ‘uncertain origin’, as many key words are that reveal profound continuity with the agendas of elites.

• Greek and Latin continuities – kara = head, karyon = kernel, corona = crown, caput = head. All maintain the same sense of enclosure and elevation.

• Biological survival – The kr-root names the kernel of the cell itself. Eukaryote = “true kernel”; prokaryote = “before kernel.” Biology unwittingly preserves the hydronymic archetype: life is always seed within shell, essence within husk.

• Serpent-genetic continuity – The cobra with its hood is an embodied enclosure, projecting vision from the crown of the head. DNA’s phi-based helix repeats the same coiled serpent form. The kernel, the coil, and the crown are all bound by the same archetype. The Krait also carries the same kr root (also see Krishna कृष्ण)

• Religious drift – Karaite Judaism encodes the same root as identity. Christ (krst) inherits the husk-container form. Crown and corona repeat the sovereignty loop.

From karst caves and husked mummies to crowned heads, cobra hoods, and the nuclei of eukaryotic cells, the kr root persists as a universal archetype. It is the recognition that essence is always housed in form. Modern genetics still calls the living nucleus a karyon — proving that the serpent of life has always been understood as kernel within coil.

The serpent archetype becomes tangible when we consider the genetic studies of the Covid spike protein, which revealed analogues to snake venoms — specifically cobra and krait.

• Nāga (cobra) – In Sanskrit, nāga denotes the cobra and is the archetypal serpent of vision, sovereignty, and crown. In temple iconography, the cobra’s hood rises as a protective cowl — the living serpent-crown of kings and gods.

• Karait (krait) – By contrast, karait is the Sanskrit word for the highly venomous Bungarus snake. Unlike nāga, which is general, karait is precise — and is the source of the modern name krait. It preserves the kr phoneme at the heart of the kernel–crown–container archetype.

• Genetic evidence – Both cobra (Naja) and krait (Bungarus) venom analogues were identified in Covid spike protein samples. This is not metaphor but molecular fact: the serpent archetypes of nāga and karait are written into the genetic serpent itself.

• Symbolic resonance – Cobra (nāga) embodies the sovereign crown, vision projected from the brow. Krait (karait) encodes the kr-root, the husk/kernel logic that runs from krst and crown to karyon and eukaryote. Together they form a dual serpent — crown and kernel — coiled within the biology of the virus.

The appearance of both cobra and krait venom analogues in Covid samples closes the circle. The linguistic kr-root, the symbolic serpent crown, and the biological kernel converge. The Covid serpent is not only a pandemic metaphor but a literal genetic embodiment of the twin serpents — nāga and karait — long enshrined in the mythic and linguistic record.

EU, Eukaryote, and the Ever-Coming Seed

The term eukaryote preserves not only the kr-root (karyon = kernel, nut, nucleus) but also the older generative archetype of eu / iu.

• Iu in Egypt – The phoneme iu was an epithet of Atum and Imhotep, meaning the “ever-coming one.” It is the generative seed, Atum’s essence projected into time. Later, this became applied to Iusa, the messianic “son who ever comes.” The eu of Greek carries this same resonance: not merely “good” or “well,” but the act of arising, becoming, perpetually coming into being.

• Seed and kernel – In biology, eukaryote = “true kernel.” The eu- prefix here aligns with the generative seed principle, while karyon names the nut/kernel itself. Thus, eukaryote literally encodes the ancient archetype: the ever-coming seed enclosed in the kernel.

• Tree of life – The same phonetic family appears in yew. The yew tree was sacred across Celtic lands, associated with eternity, regeneration, and the underworld. Ius, eus, yews share a common sound-root of eternal generative principle. Co Mayo (“plain of the yews”) was a sacred ground of Drift Culture memory. The “root and branch of Jesse” in biblical language reflects the same pattern: the eternal tree from which the messianic line arises.

• Runic continuity – The yew-root also survives in the runic tradition. The rune ᛇ, reconstructed as Eiwaz or Eihaz, comes directly from Proto-Germanic words for “yew.” Two forms are attested:

  • īhaz (from Proto-Indo-European eikos), continued in Old English as ēoh or īh.

  • īwaz (from Proto-Indo-European eiwos), continued in Old English as īw, the direct ancestor of English yew.

  The latter form may even be an early Celtic loan, parallel to Gaulish ivos, Breton ivin, Welsh ywen, and Old Irish eó.

  Thus the sacred yew was not only a tree of life in Celtic and British culture, but also encoded in the earliest Germanic alphabets. The rune ᛇ (Eiwaz) stood for the yew itself, a direct symbol of eternal life, death, and regeneration.

• Messiah archetype – Jesus as Iusa carries this same title of the ever-coming son, seed and root of eternal life. The eu / iu prefix in language is therefore more than a grammatical device — it is an archetype of perpetual arising, of life eternal.

Eukaryote fuses both archetypes: eu as the ever-coming seed, karyon as the kernel. Genes are thus named in exact accord with the oldest mythic principle: life as the eternal arising of seed from kernel, the root and branch that never ceases to come.

IU, the Root of Jesse, and the Tree of Life

The eu phoneme / iu root, preserved in eukaryote, is more than a linguistic prefix. It is the archetypal seed-sound of eternal life.

• Egyptian origin – Iu was an epithet of Atum, meaning the ever-coming one. It is also carried in Iusaaset, the feminine hand of Atum, who represents the generative field. From this iu root the title of the messiah-son, Iusa, emerged.

• Roots of Jesse – The biblical “root and branch of Jesse” is a survival of the same archetype. Jesse (Hebrew Yishai) encodes the yi / iu root, standing for the eternal tree from which the messiah arises. This is not coincidence: iu is the seed, Jesse the root, Jesus the branch.

• Religious drift of iu –

  • Yi, Ya, Io all preserve the same phoneme.

  • The divine name YHWH (rendered Yahweh or Jehovah) carries the Ya / Iu root.

  • Iao in Greek mystery religion is the same sound-cluster, recalling the Egyptian Iu.

  • Ihuh (another form of the Tetragrammaton) shows the same seed phoneme.

  All are atumological in origin: the ever-coming seed of Atum carried through into later theologies.

• Tree of life – Across cultures, the eternal tree encodes this same principle.

  • In Celtic and British lands, the yew tree (phonetic iu) was sacred, often planted in churchyards as a marker of immortality. Co Mayo, “the plain of the yews,” was a sacred site of Drift Culture.

  • In Norse myth, the axis tree is usually given as ash (Yggdrasill), but the letter Y betrays the older yew-root, which has been neglected in favour of ash.

  • In Greek tradition, the eternal tree appears in various goddess cults, linked with rebirth and sacred groves.

  • In Near Eastern tradition, Asherah, the tree-goddess, represents the same archetype — her name linked phonetically to Iusaaset.

• Hittite evidence – The early Hittite word for yew, Eya, confirms the antiquity of the iu root in relation to the eternal tree.

The iu / eu root is the archetype of eternal becoming. It underlies Jesse as the root, Jesus as the branch, YHWH as the divine name, and the sacred yew as the tree of life across cultures. The same phoneme resurfaces in eukaryote, where life itself is defined as the “ever-coming kernel.” Thus modern genetics unwittingly names itself with the most ancient of archetypes: the seed of eternity enclosed within form.

IU, Eya, and Eve

The iu archetype is not only the seed-sound of eternal life — it is also the name-form of the first woman.

• Eya and Iu – In early Hittite, Eya was the word for yew, the sacred tree of eternity. In Egypt, Iu was the epithet of Atum, the “ever-coming one.” These two forms merge: tree and seed, eternal life embodied in sound.

• Iusaaset – Atum’s feminine counterpart was Iusaaset, the “great one of Iusa,” known as the hand of Atum and co-creator. She is the archetypal tree-goddess — her glyphs show branches and life-force, the generative field itself.

• From Iu to YHWH – The divine name YHWH is built from the same root. Scholars debate its vowels, but it can be rendered as Ya, Iao, Ihuh, and even phonetically as eehveh. This makes it intimately related to Iu/Eya — the ever-coming.

• From Iu to Eve – The Hebrew Chavah (Eve) derives from the same sound-root. In phonetic flow, Iu/Iuv/Iuva easily becomes Eve. The first woman is thus a Hebrew echo of Iusaaset, Atum’s hand, the primordial feminine principle of life.

• Tree and serpent – Eve, like Iusaaset, is inseparable from the tree of life and the serpent archetype. The yew (iu / eya), the goddess, and the kernel of seed are all encoded in her name. The Genesis story obscures her origins, but the continuity of sound proves the archetype’s survival.

The iu / eya root gave rise to Jesse, Yahweh, Iao, and ultimately Eve. She is not a secondary creation, as the biblical redactors claim, but the survival of the original co-creator, Iusaaset. When read correctly, even YHWH can be voiced as Eeveh, returning us to the ever-coming goddess-seed, the tree of life, and the serpent coil entwined.

From Genesis 3:14–15 (Tree and Serpent)
“And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle… it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.”

From the Gospel of John 12:24 (Seed and Kernel)
“Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.”

From the Rig Veda (Hymn to the Serpent, RV 1.163)
“The serpent bore the embryo, the ever-coming seed. From the coiled one arose the worlds.”

From Norse Tradition (The Yew/World Tree)
“Ever green stands Yggdrasill, tallest of trees. Its roots run to the underworld, its branches to the heavens, and in its boughs coils the serpent.”

---

Concluding Note on Serpent, Seed, and Tree

The Covid serpent narrative has revealed not only a medical crisis but a deep symbolic recurrence.

• Serpent – In Sanskrit, both nāga (cobra) and karait (krait) name the serpents whose venom analogues were identified in the viral code. Cobra embodies the sovereign crown, while krait encodes the kr-root of kernel and husk. The coiled helix of DNA echoes both forms.

• Seed and kernel – The kr-root carries from krst (Osiris the husk) to karyon (kernel) and eukaryote (true kernel). The ever-coming seed of iu/eu defines life itself — the perpetual arising of form from kernel.

• Tree – The sacred yew, phonetic iu, stood as the eternal tree across Celtic and wider Drift Culture. In Hebrew tradition, Jesse is the “root,” Jesus the “branch,” echoing the same archetype of eternal becoming. In Near Eastern and Greek contexts, Asherah and Iusaaset embody the tree-goddess principle — the generative field of life.

Together these strands show that the genetic serpent of Covid is not an aberration but a recurrence of the oldest symbolic system: serpent, seed, and tree interwoven. Modern biology has unconsciously retained the same vocabulary — eukaryote, karyon — that ancient cultures used to describe eternal life, the husk and kernel of existence, and the goddess-serpent tree of renewal.

---

Holmes Gathers The Threads – His Concluding Summary

“Unresting spirit, ever pressing on — though you grasp the world, you grasp but a husk.” - From Goethe’s Faust (the modern Promethean warning)

“You seek for knowledge and wisdom, as I once did; and I ardently hope that the gratification of your wishes may not be a serpent to sting you, as mine has been.” - From Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

As Holmes would have it:

“Watson, when Ariadne herself offers me a thread, I take it. Yet this thread is no rescue cord — it is the spider’s own. If we are not cautious, it will bind us, not free us. We stand not merely before a labyrinth, but in a web. And somewhere, unseen, the spinner waits.

They have given us Chi Rho, and the XP turned into Rx. They have given us Chiron — the pharmakeus, the first master of drugs. They offered us hope as Elpis, yet in doing so they opened Pandora’s box. These dabblers never seem to learn the Promethean wisdom Mary Shelley captured so well in Frankenstein: when man presumes to play God, the end is rarely salvation. More often it is disaster.

My dear Watson, you must observe how John, that old seer on Patmos, glimpsed precisely what we have now endured. He saw it all, though translated through the lens of his age. His vials of light poured out by ministering angels — they are the golden phials of the nurse’s hand, injections given under the guise of salvation. His scorpions with stings in their tails — these are syringes, not natural stingers but devices that pierce and inject. Their sting is not death but torment, just as he wrote: affliction for months, suffering without release.

The pit from which they rise is smoke and soot, the black body of carbon itself — the same 666 structure of life manipulated into perverted form. The very manipulation of RNA, the chemistry of CHOP, is here echoed in his number of the beast. He did not know the language of nucleotides, but he saw the Field’s recursion: the serpent of code, the sting of the injection, the vial poured into flesh.

What he called Revelation, we call biotechnology. What he feared as scorpions, we know as needles. And what he set down as 666, we now recognise as the number of carbon, scaffold of our DNA, turned against itself by artifice.

It is all of a piece. The angels, the vials, the sting, the number. All are one pattern, the same archetype repeated. To dismiss this as mere coincidence is folly. John saw the Field’s ripple, the pre-echo of what would be. He recorded it faithfully, though cloaked in the symbols of his time. And now, Watson, the prophecy has walked into our century, not as myth but as fact clothed in symbol.

Yet Watson, what chills me most is not only the venom, nor the sting, but the name that life itself has carried since its origin. They call the cell a eukaryote — the true kernel — and in that word lies the whole history of the serpent. Kr, the husk of Osiris, became the crown upon the king, the kernel of the seed, the hood of the cobra. And eu, the ever-coming seed of Atum, became the root of Jesse and the branch of the messiah. The serpent, the seed, and the tree have always been one archetype — the goddess’s coil entwined with the kernel of life. To see both cobra and krait written in the code of this plague is no chance, Watson. It is the Field itself reminding us that what we tamper with are not molecules, but the oldest patterns of existence.

That serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who stands before the woman ready to devour her child, has become the very spirit of the mRNA platform — gathering in the womb and in the testes, threatening to sterilise the greater portion of mankind. Such a diabolical plan, executed with this degree of complexity and precision, to reduce the population of the earth — can this truly be the work of men alone? There is a darker hand here, Watson — a foe against whom even I may be powerless.

The vilest depths of human depravity, as I have often said, are always possible. And here they have been enacted. The serpent has struck again — but this time, its venom was designed, its sting delivered by the hand of man himself.

The time is short, and we must prepare ourselves for whatever is to come. Let us pray we are not too late.

The Curious Case of the Covid Serpent is not over. It is only beginning.

Watson! The game is afoot!”

---