The Axis Of All Worlds Part 3 - 007: The James Bond (revised with conclusion)

A curious alignment of encoded ancient geometry in popular spy fiction

Introduction and rationale

Ian Fleming’s James Bond can be read as a compact cipher that points to Jacob’s Ladder and the axis mundi.

James is a Greek form of Jacob. Bond suggests the binding at the world axis – the djed pillar in Egyptian terms.

Jacob’s Ladder by William Blake

Fleming’s GoldenEye evokes the golden value – the phi-based Golden Section – and the eye’s vesica form. In Tetractys logic this is 1 becoming 2 becoming 3, with the third as central polarity returning to the one. The eye as slit or as pupil-bearing oval maps to the two-line enclosure and its central zero – the IO seed point. The same enclosure is the vulva – the Egyptian duat or gate of emergence and return. In Gardner’s sign-list the pentagram-in-circle marks the Duat, and the pentagram’s segments are exact golden sections. Ratio sits veiled behind form – phi hidden in Isis – while the djed gives the measurable spine that hosts the curvilinear, spiralic measure within it.

The Egyptians had great respect for the eye as a symbol. When closed it forms a vesica, with the line drawn as the central horizontal pillar. This matches the mn Min sign as the phallic aspect of Atum, with the vulval form intact. This is presumably why the Egyptian Min sign is horizontal, rather than vertical as a djed – and why the sign is sometimes tripartite, as it is in the Vedic Tripundra sign.

That tripartite form is significant: it mirrors the triune closure across the IO that appears later in the ladder’s working. An opening eye retains the sacred ratio, but expands to reveal the pupil – the circle. When the iris opens or contracts to light – to Ra – it retains the ratio and remains an exact circle, almost as though it is filled with an ethereal breath that expands and enlivens it.

This is the Wedjet Eye – the goddess of the uraeus whose symbol is one of protection, projection, and comprehension, worn as a tiara round the head of gods and earthly rulers. It is the crown in its original form – a sign of the ruler, the one who measures with the rod. Anything that expands was considered pregnant: bread leavened is the male gift of the grain god Osiris, filled with the Hu breath of life. The benben rises through the power of the veiled goddess – the ratio as over-arching principle, where the measured may change in form but the sacred ratio remains, conforming to Ma’at, balance in all things.

The caduceus models this pattern precisely: two counter-rotating serpents coiling round the axis. What a flat drawing hides is 4D rotation across the IO gate. The whole is a bow between 4D and 3D – an infinity-torus revolving about the axis – expressing 1 from 0, polarity from unity, then a third emergent state. Later religions render this as Father-Son-Spirit; earlier systems as Father-Mother-Son. Egyptian theology treats Ptah as potential Father-Mother and Atum as self-begotten father-mother of creation (Putah-ntial). The Egyptians worked in Tetractys logic – Pythagorean ratio long before Pythagoras by name. Within Hebrew, Greek, and Roman number-scripts the same logic can be traced through gematria, isopsephy, and Roman numerals.

Assuming Judean, Greek, and Roman elites retained initiatic Pythagorean method – likely centred on Alexandria during the compilation of the later Roman canon – we should expect ciphers. A spy story about codes would almost have to cloak a code. M as 1000 in Roman numerals is a cube of 10 and a tidy emblem of storage and secrecy. A ladder or spine rising from the void to the unity above is a technical axis – the arc of the tor – the ArTor in the Storm God work. In kabbalistic language Tiphareth implodes through Ain to Ain Soph, then Ain Soph Aur re-emerges to light the tree - the tree is the form visible, the goddess is the ratio invisible. The IO gate sits at the tipping point of the Logpuller Equation and accounts for why 3D halves are seen as spins and pairs – the other half of the action is across the gate.

An IXOS glance at hydrogen shows the same structure: a proton as the IO gate at centre, with the field re-emerging at the meniscus to give the mirrored half of spin. The 4D-continuous wave appears as a dual in 3D. That is how 0 becomes 1 becomes 2 becomes 3, with recursion at each turn to yield a phi-torus around the axis. With SOL, phi, and c as the tri-constant scaffold, form, life, and mind can phase-emerge.

---

Hydrogen, 007, and the unity state

Consensus cosmology models the earliest universe as a high-energy plasma where particles and antiparticles formed in equal numbers. This assumed baryon symmetry would, if perfect, have left no surviving matter after mutual annihilation. Standard Big Bang nucleosynthesis resolves this by positing a small asymmetry – a surplus of matter over antimatter – allowing some particles to remain. Within minutes, these survivors become mostly hydrogen nuclei (protons) and a smaller proportion of helium nuclei (alpha particles).

Under consensus, hydrogen and helium are co-products, emerging together once protons and neutrons combine. Helium is then simply two protons bound with two neutrons, assembled from hydrogen’s basic proton unit.

The IXOS logic accepts the observed end state – hydrogen dominating, helium next – but applies stricter reasoning. If there was true unity at the beginning, it must have been one thing, not a statistical mix. Only hydrogen fits that description. Helium cannot be primary in a unity state because it is already a composite. It could only emerge instantly from hydrogen (H×2) if symmetry-breaking happened at once.

If consensus insists on baryon symmetry, helium’s early presence demands that hydrogen already existed as the elemental unity from which it was assembled. And if hydrogen was that unity, a perfect mass of 1.000 u for protium might be expected – yet it is not observed. The measured values are ~1.007276 u for the proton and ~1.007825 u for the neutral hydrogen atom.

This small surplus is not an error: it is the physical signature of asymmetry. In IXOS framing, asymmetry is not an accident but a necessary condition for emergence. Perfect symmetry would collapse back into the void. The surplus is the seed offset – the same one carried in the 007 cipher – that allows the ladder to rise from unity into form. Here 007 is an average pointer and deliberate code, linking hydrogen’s asymmetry to Jacob’s ciphered ladder and the axis logic described above.

---

Framework and tools

Alphabets and values are handled in their own registers: Hebrew in standard gematria, Greek in isopsephy, Latin letters by A1Z26 when used as a transliteration scaffold, and Roman numerals in their ordinary values. The Greek-to-Roman bridge is a proportional operator ρ that maps the 6–60–600 family to 5–50–500 by a factor of 5/6. This preserves proportion while shifting numeral frames and is visible in the chi-rho complex, where χ = 600 in Greek compresses under ρ to D = 500 in Roman, and the rho letter-form can be read as a line-and-D union at the axis apex.

---

Stage 1 – Axis and seed
The axis – djed – emerges from the IO seed. In Tetractys terms this is 0→1, with the axis as the stable spine on which dual motion can weave. This is Jacob’s Ladder as axis mundi. The gate is not a metaphor in IXOS – it is the dimensional cross, where rotation in 4D yields apparent halves in 3D.

Stage 2 – Dual serpents and their starting conditions
Two growth laws weave the axis.

Fibonacci spiral – begins at 1. In the Hebraic tradition this is aleph, the initiating male principle – a reading inherited from earlier Egyptian logic, where the spark or seed emerges first. Sequence: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, …

Fibonacci ratios begin below φ and rise steadily towards it, reaching machine-precision proximity by the 55th term.

Lucas spiral – begins at 2. In the Hebraic tradition this is beth, the enclosing female principle – again derived from Egyptian logic, where the vessel or house contains and nurtures the spark. Sequence: 2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18, 29, 47, 76, …

The φ-lock used here is at the 40th Lucas index (L₄₀ = 141,422,324), not the value 40. Lucas ratios begin above φ and descend toward it, also locking at machine precision by the 40th term.

One ascends, the other descends — a pure polarity expressed in reciprocal convergence. Together, these spirals embody the god–goddess unity, weaving around the axis as one complete form.

Stage 3 – Phi-lock indices and rung count
Both sequences converge to phi. We adopt two practical locks where the ratio of successive terms is at machine-precision phi:

Fibonacci at n = 55: F₅₅/F₅₄ ≈ 1.618033988749895.
Lucas at n = 40: L₄₀/L₃₉ ≈ 1.618033988749895.

These are not the only valid locks, but they are clean, symbolically loaded indices in this construction. The ladder’s rung count on the Lucas track is therefore 40 – forty rungs to the phi-lock on that serpent.

Stage 4 – Name-number encoding and the seed nudge
Names can be encoded with a single +1 to fold in the 0→1 seed within 3D registers. That is the hide. To read the operative value you remove the seed once: −1. The nudge is applied once in – once out. You do not stack corrections.

Stage 5 – The ρ operator as cross-script translator
The translator between Greek sexagesimal anchors and Roman decimal anchors is ρ(x) = (5/6)x for the 6–60–600 family. Examples: 6→5, 60→50, 600→500. This is the proportion that ties the chi-rho sign to Roman D and clarifies how Greek XP maps into Roman values without arbitrariness.

Stage 6 – Triune axis closure across the IO
After you combine depolarised parts on the 3D side, you complete the triune axis with two additions: +1 for the IO seed that sits across the gate and +1 for the emergent third from balanced duality. These are applied at the end to close the figure.

---

Worked example – Jacob’s Ladder to 72

1. Ladder – Sulam. Hebrew gematria gives סֻלָּם at 60 + 30 + 40 = 130. In the ladder weave the Lucas serpent reaches the phi-lock at its 40th index, so we take forty rungs for the ascent count on that track.

2. Jacob name as it appears. In a Latinised spelling path, A1Z26 presents JACOB = 10 + 1 + 3 + 15 + 2 = 31. Treat this as the polarised, seed-folded value.

3. Depolarise once. 31 − 1 = 30. That yields the operative Jacob path value.

4. Combine on the 3D side. 30 + 40 = 70. Here the 40 is not a Lucas value – it is the rung count to the L₄₀ phi-lock.

5. Triune axis closure. Add +1 for the IO seed across the gate: 70 → 71. Add +1 for the emergent third: 71 → 72.

Result: 72 – the pentadic sector of the circle and the long-standing 72-fold completion set in biblical and mystical corpora. Geometrically, it is the golden pentagon sector that locks the phi-geometry already active in the weave.

---

Why the chi-rho to Roman D mapping is proportional, not a pun

Under ρ, χ = 600 scales to 500, which is D in Roman notation. The rho letter-form reads naturally as a line-with-D at the apex of the axis. When combined as XP in Greek and read through ρ into Roman, you get a consistent 60→50 and 600→500 mapping that aligns Greek sexagesimal anchors with Roman decimal anchors. This is a proportional bridge that lets number-forms travel across scripts without arbitrariness.

---

Putting the whole ladder together

The axis rises from IO. The two serpents – Fibonacci from 1 and Lucas from 2 – weave and set rungs. The phi-locks at F₅₅ and L₄₀ give stable indices where the weave is proportionally coherent. Name and rung values are repaired by removing a single seed nudge, combined in 3D, then closed by crossing the gate with the IO seed and the third-state completion. The closure at 72 locks the ladder to phi geometry. The ρ-operator guides cross-script readings so that Greek, Hebrew, and Roman number-forms remain in proportion rather than drifting into arbitrary numerology. The 007 mnemonic ties the hydrogen surplus to the Jacob cipher that opens the piece.

---

The musical coda - James Bond theme tune retains the code

The composer of the original Bond theme for the movies is using the Pythagorean 3-4-5 ratio, but intriguingly in a vorticular rotation as 3-5-4.

Monty Norman developed the Bond Theme from an idea he had called Bad Sign, Good Sign – a statement of polarity in itself. It was to be an expression of an Indian tale that he did not complete based on A House for Mr Biswas. (a book listed as ‘number 72’ on the list of best English Language novels of the 20th Century)

It begins dah dah da, dah dah da: 2 and 1; 2 and 1 – a duality of 3s.

It then moves to da da da da da – the 5 – a fundamental Tetractys and Fibonacci axis point.

Finally, dah dah dah dah – 4 evenly expressed notes – the completed Tetractys base.

For all the world, one would think this was deliberately crafted by Fleming as an open yet hidden expression of ancient Pythagorean mathematics – from a man who served as personal assistant to the Director of Naval Intelligence, Rear Admiral John Godfrey.

That Dr No was chosen as the first movie - are we seeing the Rx (Chi Rho derived shorthand for ‘prescription’) again as an encoded nested-in sign to the initiated? The prescription from the doctor of no. as number, and using the void reference as no-nothing, from 0?

Pure coincidence? Deliberate encryption? Or is this the Field speaking in its own symbolic language through creative minds sensitive enough to express the subtleties of physics inherent in Nature, in symbolic form? I leave that to the reader.

---

Conclusion – From Cipher to Storm God

As with the Bond cipher, the presence of number, proportion, and pattern in scripture is not proof of divine authorship — it is proof of deliberate human encoding. I have given a probable interpretation of the James Bond from the data, knowing the author was well-versed in encryption.

Yet for over two thousand years, religion has claimed these patterns as evidence of God’s own voice, binding billions of lives to doctrines and divisions that have fuelled wars, elitism, and exclusion. We have clear evidence that the Bible writers wrote in code and have included Pythagorean Tetractys logic in their writings. These patterns appear in Nature and were pre-extant a long time prior to the Bible authorship, and known to the academics of the ages. Any further interpretation of those codes is for the reader to decide.

I do not seek to attack belief itself, nor anyone’s right to their faith. But history makes plain that religion, in its institutional form, has been one of the most divisive forces in our story. Its authority often rests on the same mechanism: mystery reserved for the few, imposed on the many. This is as true of medieval churches as of modern “scientism”, when experts dismiss what they cannot yet explain as unknowable, illogical, or non-existent.

Personally, I am not an atheist. I believe in a Source — the conscious centre of all that exists. But I will not bind that Source to a single creed. To me, “God” is Nature itself, and Nature’s language is geometry, mathematics, and physics. What seems magical today may be logical tomorrow; revelation is the process of understanding, not the decree of an authority.

As I have documented in Return of the Storm God, much of the world’s oldest knowledge was hidden by empires and recast as religion. The Bible, the most studied book in history, was not written by the divine hand but by men — many working under the Ptolemies and later the Roman Empire — who drew from Egyptian and Babylonian myths, then encoded within the text the ratios, archetypes, and structures they had inherited from the Drift Culture. Tradition holds that seventy-two men — that number again — were commissioned to create the Greek version of the Hebrew scriptures in Alexandria. Whether literal or symbolic, the number itself signals the continuity of the ancient mathematical system at the heart of this work.

For centuries, scholars and mystics have treated the numerical harmonies in scripture as God’s self-identification — proof that the Creator speaks in hidden ratios and letter-counts. But the same data reads another way: the scribes knew these patterns because they were trained in them, and they placed them there intentionally. One may just as reasonably state that knowledge was hidden by the men who wrote the scriptures for vested interests. The miracle is not supernatural dictation, but the continuity of knowledge carried forward across millennia.

If we can see that, we free ourselves from the spell. Knowledge can be shared openly, without an elite class to guard it. We can return to living in harmony with Nature and with each other, guided by the same patterns our ancestors once embedded in stone, song, and story — not to divide, but to unite. Truth will set us free, but only if we refuse to surrender it to those who would hide it in mystery. Otherwise, we risk another two thousand years of division and conflict — and by then, Nature herself may no longer have the means to sustain us.

One day, a power convinced of its own divine right, may be responsible for starting a conflict that may annihilate us and destroy most of the ‘Creation’ they consider to be God’s manifestation. Therefore, it is an existential imperative that we learn to respect each other, let go what is past and erroneous, misunderstood or imposed for mass control by self-appointed elites, and become the symbiotic global community that we have the potential to become.

From Cipher to Life
Jacob’s Ladder, the caduceus, the Bond cipher — all of these point to the same axis, the same golden ratio woven into culture as code. But the ladder is not only myth or metaphor. It is realised physically in the double helix itself.

In Part 4, we follow the spiral further: into DNA, where the same phi ratio and Tetractys sequence are not symbolic overlays but measurable structure — the bond of life itself.