Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ivan Fraser's avatar

Me neither. I'd rather exist naturally within the patterns of Nature. But it's the way of people to label.

We are qite in sync here.

Expand full comment
Hans Stein's avatar

Thanks for your kindf response. I do think we should remain in the realm of experience, and perceive light by its action and effect only, without trying to model its nature in terms of analogy to perceived (secondary with regards to light) phenomena. The same for nucleons and electrons: Their nature per se remains hidden. Their actions and effects reveal their purpose in our reality.

I understand you had some mystical experiences along the way. Remain critical of them. About most of them are deceptive and the cause of all sorts of errors. (Because of them we have thousands of (false) religions and ideologies and convictions fightinh each other and dividing humanity into a haughty and unruly and hateful bunch.)

The IOXS/IXOS (?) terminology is not entirely convincing and kind of distracting, too. (I am not a friend of acronyms and invented names for branding stuff.)

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts